Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century

被引:360
作者
Podsakoff, Philip M. [1 ]
MacKenzie, Scott B. [2 ]
Podsakoff, Nathan P. [3 ]
Bachrach, Daniel G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Dept Management, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Dept Mkt, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Management, Dept Management & Org, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[4] Univ Alabama, Culverhouse Coll Commerce & Business Adm, Dept Management, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
citation analysis; bibliometric techniques; scholarly impact; university impact;
D O I
10.1177/0149206308319533
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to identify the universities and research scholars who have had the greatest impact on the field of management during the past quarter century and the factors that influence their impact. Using bibliometric techniques, the authors examined 30 management journals to identify the 100 most-cited universities and 150 most-cited authors from 1981 to 2004. The analysis included more than 1,600 universities and 25,000 management scholars across five individual time periods. The findings showed that (a) a relatively small proportion of universities and scholars accounted for the majority of the citations in the field; (b) total publications accounted for the majority of the variance in university citations; (c) university size, the number of PhDs awarded, research expenditures, and endowment assets had the biggest impact on university publications; and (d) total publications, years in the field, graduate school reputation, and editorial board memberships had the biggest effect on a scholar's citations.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 720
页数:80
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   DEPARTMENTAL EFFECTS ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY [J].
ALLISON, PD ;
LONG, JS .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 55 (04) :469-478
[2]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[3]  
Bellas ML, 1999, REV HIGH EDUC, V22, P367
[4]   A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity [J].
Bland, CJ ;
Center, BA ;
Finstad, DA ;
Risbey, KR ;
Staples, JG .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (03) :225-237
[5]   EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT JOURNALS - A 2ND LOOK [J].
COE, R ;
WEINSTOCK, I .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1984, 27 (03) :660-666
[6]   SCIENTIFIC OUTPUT AND RECOGNITION - STUDY IN OPERATION OF REWARD SYSTEM IN SCIENCE [J].
COLE, S ;
COLE, JR .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1967, 32 (03) :377-390
[8]  
*CTR MEAS U PERF, 2007, AM RES U DAT
[9]   Relations between the continuous and the discrete Lotka power function [J].
Egghe, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 56 (07) :664-668
[10]   THE BEHAVIORAL-SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT - AN EVALUATION OF RELEVANT JOURNALS [J].
EXTEJT, MM ;
SMITH, JE .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1990, 16 (03) :539-551