Relation of cognitive reserve and task performance to expression of regional covariance networks in an event-related fMRI study of nonverbal memory

被引:61
作者
Habeck, C
Hilton, HJ
Zarahn, E
Flynn, J
Moeller, J
Stern, Y
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Div Taub, Cognit Neurosci Div, Inst Res Alzheimers Dis & Aging Brain,Coll Phys &, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Neurol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.032
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Cognitive reserve (CR) has been established as a mechanism that can explain individual differences in the clinical manifestation of neural changes associated with aging or neurodegenerative diseases. CR may represent individual differences in how tasks are processed (i.e., differences in the component processes), or in the underlying neural circuitry (of the component processes). CR may be a function of innate differences or differential life experiences. To investigate to what extent CR can account for individual differences in brain activation and task performance, we used fMRI to image healthy young individuals while performing a nonverbal memory task. We used IQ estimates as a proxy for CR. During both study and test phase of the task, we identified regional covariance patterns whose change in subject expression across two task conditions correlated with performance and CR. Common brain regions in both activation patterns were suggestive of a brain network previously found to underlie overt and covert shifts of spatial attention. After partialing out the influence of task performance variables, this network still showed an association with the CR, i.e., there were reserve-related physiological differences that presumably would persist were there no subject differences in task performance. This suggests that this network may represent a neural correlate of CR. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1733
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Individual differences in PET activation of object perception and attention systems predict face matching accuracy [J].
Alexander, GE ;
Mentis, MJ ;
Van Horn, JD ;
Grady, CL ;
Berman, KF ;
Furey, ML ;
Pietrini, P ;
Rapoport, SI ;
Schapiro, MB ;
Moeller, JR .
NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (09) :1965-1971
[2]   A parametric fMRI study of overt and covert shifts of visuospatial attention [J].
Beauchamp, MS ;
Petit, L ;
Ellmore, TM ;
Ingeholm, J ;
Haxby, JV .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (02) :310-321
[3]   A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events [J].
Burgess, N ;
Maguire, EA ;
Spiers, HJ ;
O'Keefe, J .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (02) :439-453
[4]  
Burnham K. P., 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT
[5]  
Cabeza R, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P391
[6]   Age-related differences in effective neural connectivity during encoding and recall [J].
Cabeza, R ;
McIntosh, AR ;
Tulving, E ;
Nyberg, L ;
Grady, CL .
NEUROREPORT, 1997, 8 (16) :3479-3483
[7]   Aging gracefully: Compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults [J].
Cabeza, R ;
Anderson, ND ;
Locantore, JK ;
McIntosh, AR .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (03) :1394-1402
[8]   fMRI activation in a visual-perception task: Network of areas detected using the general linear model and independent components analysis [J].
Calhoun, VD ;
Adali, T ;
McGinty, VB ;
Pekar, JJ ;
Watson, TD ;
Pearlson, GD .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (05) :1080-1088
[9]  
Efron E., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP
[10]   The preclinical phase of Alzheimer disease -: A 22-year prospective study of the Framingham cohort [J].
Elias, MF ;
Beiser, A ;
Wolf, PA ;
Au, R ;
White, RF ;
D'Agostino, RB .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2000, 57 (06) :808-813