Comparison of disability and quality of life measures in patients with long-term psychotic disorders and patients with multiple sclerosis: an application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II and WHO Quality of Life-BREF

被引:25
作者
Chopra, Prem [1 ,2 ]
Herrman, Helen [2 ]
Kennedy, Genevieve [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp Melbourne, Fitzroy, Vic 3065, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
disability; health-related quality of life; multiple sclerosis; psychotic disorders; WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II; WHO Quality of Life;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0b013e32830150e6
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to compare the applications of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 11 (WHODAS 11) and WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) in the assessment of patients with psychotic disorders and multiple sclerosis, and to assess the feasibility and usefulness of such universal measures in the psychiatric as well as physical rehabilitation setting. Twenty patients with psychotic disorders from St Vincent's Mental Health Service and 20 patients from the Medical Rehabilitation Ward of St Vincent's Hospital were assessed. The WHODAS 11 and WHOQOL-BREF were administered to each patient to obtain their perception of the impact of their disability and their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The WHODAS 11 and WHOQOL-BREF interviews were meaningful as they highlighted aspects of patients' disabilities as well as issues that led to impairment in HRQoL. The WHODAS 11 and WHOQOL-BREF total scores were higher overall for patients with multiple sclerosis, reflecting, in particular, the physical impact of this condition. Patients with psychotic disorders generally did not report difficulty in self-care. Both patients with multiple sclerosis and patients with psychotic disorders reported similar levels of difficulty in the domain of participation in society. Universal measures of disability and HRQoL are feasible for use in patients with long-term physical and psychiatric illnesses. Similarities in the disability profiles of patients in the two groups reflect the consequences of the long-term conditions under investigation. Both groups of patients reported similar levels of social disability, confirming that barriers to participation in society affect all patients with disabling conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 149
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   The assessment of patients with long-term psychotic disorders: application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II [J].
Chopra, PK ;
Couper, JW ;
Herrman, H .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 38 (09) :753-759
[2]   The Australian National Survey of Psychotic Disorders: profile of psychosocial disability and its risk factors [J].
Gureje, O ;
Herrman, H ;
Harvey, C ;
Morgan, V ;
Jablensky, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (04) :639-647
[3]  
HERRMAN H, 1995, CURR OPIN PSYCHIATR, V11, P175
[4]   MJA practice essentials - 9. Neurological disability and neurological rehabilitation [J].
Macdonell, RAL ;
Dewey, HM .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2001, 174 (12) :653-658
[5]   Do general and multiple sclerosis specific quality of life instruments differ? [J].
Moore, F ;
Wolfson, C ;
Alexandrov, L ;
Lapierre, Y .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 31 (01) :64-71
[6]  
MURPHY B, 2000, AUSTR WHOOOL INSTRUM
[7]   Patient and community preferences for treatments and health states in multiple sclerosis [J].
Prosser, LA ;
Kuntz, KM ;
Bar-Or, A ;
Weinstein, MC .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2003, 9 (03) :311-319
[8]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - COMPARISON WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL-DISEASE AND RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
RUDICK, RA ;
MILLER, D ;
CLOUGH, JD ;
GRAGG, LA ;
FARMER, RG .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1992, 49 (12) :1237-1242
[9]   Multiple sclerosis: assessment of disability and disability scales [J].
Thompson, AJ ;
Hobart, JC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1998, 245 (04) :189-196
[10]  
*WHO, 1999, WHO DAS 2 VERS 3 1A