The PROFI Study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting) A Prospective Randomized Trial

被引：203

作者：

Bijuklic, Klaudija ^{[1
]}

Wandler, Andreas ^{[1
]}

Hazizi, Fadia ^{[1
]}

Schofer, Joachim ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hamburg, Ctr Cardiovasc, Med Care Ctr Prof Mathey, D-22527 Hamburg, Germany

来源：

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY | 2012年 / 59卷 / 15期

关键词：

carotid artery stenting; cerebral embolic protection; diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; EMBOLIC PROTECTION; HIGH-RISK; ENDARTERECTOMY; STROKE; MICROEMBOLIZATION; ANGIOPLASTY; ISCHEMIA; DEVICES; UPDATE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.035

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Objectives The objective of this study was to compare the cerebral embolic load of filter-protected versus proximal balloon-protected carotid artery stenting (CAS). Background Randomized trials comparing filter-protected CAS with carotid endarterectomy revealed a higher periprocedural stroke rate after CAS. Proximal balloon occlusion may be more effective in preventing cerebral embolization during CAS than filters. Methods Patients undergoing CAS with cerebral embolic protection for internal carotid artery stenosis were randomly assigned to proximal balloon occlusion or filter protection. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new cerebral ischemic lesions assessed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary endpoints were the number and volume of new ischemic lesions and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE). Results Sixty-two consecutive patients (mean age: 71.7 years, 76.4% male) were randomized. Compared with filter protection (n = 31), proximal balloon occlusion (n = 31) resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence of new cerebral ischemic lesions (45.2% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.001). The number (median [range]: 2 [0 to 13] vs. 0 [0 to 4], p = 0.0001) and the volume (0.47 [0 to 2.4] cm(3) vs. 0 [0 to 0.84] cm(3), p = 0.0001) of new cerebral ischemic lesions were significantly reduced by proximal balloon occlusion. Lesions in the contralateral hemisphere were found in 29.0% and 6.5% of patients (filter vs. balloon occlusion, respectively, p = 0.047). The 30-day MACCE rate was 3.2% and 0% for filter versus balloon occlusion, respectively (p = NS). Conclusions In this randomized trial of patients undergoing CAS, proximal balloon occlusion as compared with filter protection significantly reduced the embolic load to the brain. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1383-9) (C) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

引用

页码：1383 / 1389

页数：7

共 29 条

[1] Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack
Adams, Robert J.
Albers, Greg
Alberts, Mark J.
Benavente, Oscar
Furie, Karen
Goldstein, Larry B.
Gorelick, Philip
Halperin, Jonathan
Harbaugh, Robert
Johnston, S. Claiborne
Katzan, Irene
Kelly-Hayes, Margaret
Kenton, Edgar J.
Marks, Michael
Sacco, Ralph L.
Schwamm, Lee H.
[J]. STROKE, 2008, 39 (05) : 1647 - 1652
[2] Safety and Effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA® Proximal Cerebral Protection Device During Carotid Artery Stenting: Results From the ARMOUR Pivotal Trial
Ansel, Gary M.
Hopkins, L. Nelson
Jaff, Michael R.
Rubino, Paolo
Bacharach, J. Michael
Scheinert, Dierk
Myla, Subbarao
Das, Tony
Cremonesi, Alberto
[J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 76 (01) : 1 - 8
[3] ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting - A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting)
Bates, Eric R.
Babb, Joseph D.
Casey, Donald E., Jr.
Cates, Christopher U.
Duckwiler, Gary R.
Feldman, Ted E.
Gray, William A.
Ouriel, Kenneth
Peterson, Eric D.
Rosenfield, Kenneth
Rundback, John H.
Safian, Robert D.
Sloan, Michael A.
White, Christopher J.
Harrington, Robert A.
Abrams, Jonathan
Anderson, Jefrey L.
Eisenberg, Mark J.
Grines, Cindy L.
Hlatky, Mark A.
Lichtenberg, Robert C.
Lindner, Jonathan R.
Pohost, Gerald M.
Schofield, Richard S.
Shubrooks, Samuel J., Jr.
Stein, James H.
Tracy, Cynthia M.
Vogel, Robert A.
Wesley, Deborah J.
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (01) : 126 - 170
[4] Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study
Bendszus, M
Koltzenburg, M
Burger, R
Warmuth-Metz, M
Hofmann, E
Solymosi, L
[J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9190) : 1594 - 1597
[5] Carotid artery stenting, what can be learned after more than 1,000 patients: a single centre single operator experience
Bijuklic, Klaudija
Tuebler, Thilo
Wandler, Andreas
Goossens-Merkt, Heinrich
Schofer, Joachim
[J]. EUROINTERVENTION, 2011, 7 (07) : 820 - 827
[6] Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting?
Bosiers, M.
de Donato, G.
Deloose, K.
Verbist, J.
Peeters, P.
Castriota, F.
Cremonesi, A.
Setacci, C.
[J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 33 (02) : 135 - 141
[7] Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis
Brott, Thomas G.
Hobson, Robert W., II
Howard, George
Roubin, Gary S.
Clark, Wayne M.
Brooks, William
Mackey, Ariane
Hill, Michael D.
Leimgruber, Pierre P.
Sheffet, Alice J.
Howard, Virginia J.
Moore, Wesley S.
Voeks, Jenifer H.
Hopkins, L. Nelson
Cutlip, Donald E.
Cohen, David J.
Popma, Jeffrey J.
Ferguson, Robert D.
Cohen, Stanley N.
Blackshear, Joseph L.
Silver, Frank L.
Mohr, J. P.
Lal, Brajesh K.
Meschia, James F.
[J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (01) : 11 - 23
[8] Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices - Predictors and clinical outcome
Casserly, IP
Abou-Chebl, A
Fathi, RB
Lee, DS
Saw, J
Exaire, JE
Kapadia, SR
Bajzer, CT
Yadav, JS
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (08) : 1466 - 1472
[9] Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial
Ederle, Joerg
Dobson, Joanna
Featherstone, Roland L.
Bonati, Leo H.
van der Worp, H. Bart
de Borst, Gert J.
Lo, T. Hauw
Gaines, Peter
Dorman, Paul J.
Macdonald, Sumaira
Lyrer, Philippe A.
Hendriks, Johanna M.
McCollum, Charles
Nederkoorn, Paul J.
Brown, Martin M.
Algra, A.
Bamford, J.
Beard, J.
Bland, M.
Bradbury, A. W.
Brown, M. M.
Clifton, A.
Gaines, P.
Hacke, W.
Halliday, A.
Malik, I.
Mas, J. L.
McGuire, A. J.
Sidhu, P.
Venables, G.
Bradbury, A.
Brown, M. M.
Clifton, A.
Gaines, P.
Collins, R.
Molynewc, A.
Naylor, R.
Warlow, C.
Ferro, J. M.
Thomas, D.
Bonati, L. H.
Coward, L.
Dobson, J.
Ederle, J.
Featherstone, R. F.
Tindall, H.
McCabe, D. J. H.
Wallis, A.
Brooks, M.
Chambers, B.
[J]. LANCET, 2010, 375 (9719) : 985 - 997
[10] Periprocedural embolic events related to carotid artery stenting detected by diffusion-weighted MRI: Comparison between proximal and distal embolus protection devices
El-Koussy, Marwan
Schroth, Gerhard
Do, Dai-Do
Gralla, Jan
Nedeltchev, Krassen
von Bredow, Ferdinand
Remonda, Luca
Brekenfeld, Caspar
[J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2007, 14 (03) : 293 - 303

← 1 2 3 →