A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: The quality oncology practice initiative

被引:202
作者
Neuss, MN
Desch, CE
McNiff, KK
Eisenberg, PD
Gesme, DH
Jacobson, JO
Jahanzeb, M
Padberg, JJ
Rainey, JM
Guo, JJ
Simone, JV
机构
[1] Oncol Hematol Care, Cincinnati, OH 45236 USA
[2] Virginia Canc Inst, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Amer Soc Clin Oncol, Alexandria, VA USA
[4] Amer Soc Therapeut Radiol & Oncol, Fairfax, VA USA
[5] Calif Canc Care, Greenbrae, CA USA
[6] Oncol Assoc, Cedar Rapids, IA USA
[7] N Shore Canc Ctr, Peabody, MA USA
[8] Boston Baskin Canc Grp, Memphis, TN USA
[9] Louisiana Oncol Assoc, Lafayette, LA USA
[10] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[11] Simone Consulting Co, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.05.948
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) is a practice-based system of quality self-assessment sponsored by the participants and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The process of quality evaluation, development of the pilot questionnaire, and preliminary results are reported. Methods Physicians from seven oncology groups developed medical record abstraction measures based on practice guidelines and consensus-supported indicators of quality care. Each practice completed two rounds of records review and received practice and aggregate results. Mean frequencies of responses for each indicator were compared among practices. Results Participants universally, if informally, find QOPI helpful, and results show statistically significant variation among practices for several indicators, including assessing pain in patients close to death, documentation of informed consent for chemotherapy, and concordance with granulocytic and erythroid growth factor administration guidelines. Measures with universally high concordance include the use of serotonin antagonist antiemetics according to the ASCO guideline; the presence of a pathology report in the record; the use of chemotherapy flow sheets; and adherence to standard chemotherapy recommendations for patients with certain stages of breast, colon, and rectal cancer. Concordance with quality indicators significantly changed between survey rounds for several measures. Conclusion Pilot results indicate that the QOPI process provides a rapid and objective measurement of practice quality that allows comparisons among practices and over time. It also provides a mechanism for measuring concordance with published guidelines. Most importantly, it provides a tool for practice self-examination that can promote excellence in cancer care.
引用
收藏
页码:6233 / 6239
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Improving patient safety - Five years after the IOM report [J].
Altman, DE ;
Clancy, C ;
Blendon, RJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (20) :2041-2043
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
[3]   2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J].
Bast, RC ;
Ravdin, P ;
Hayes, DF ;
Bates, S ;
Fritsche, H ;
Jessup, JM ;
Kemeny, N ;
Locker, GY ;
Mennel, RG ;
Somerfield, MR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1865-1878
[4]  
Begg CB, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1044
[5]  
Chan A, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, p56S
[6]  
*COD FED REG, 2001, NAT I HLTH OFF PROT
[7]  
De Moor C, 2003, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V22, P727
[8]   Factors that determine the treatment for local and regional prostate cancer [J].
Desch, CE ;
Penberthy, L ;
Newschaffer, CJ ;
Hillner, BE ;
Whittemore, M ;
McClish, D ;
Smith, TJ ;
Retchin, SM .
MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (02) :152-162
[9]  
Desch CE, 1998, CANC TREAT, P53
[10]   Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors [J].
Earle, CC ;
Burstein, HJ ;
Winer, EP ;
Weeks, JC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (08) :1447-1451