Biodurability of retrieved silicone gel breast implants

被引:33
作者
Brandon, HJ
Jerina, KL
Wolf, CJ
Young, VL
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Mech Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Chem Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Body Aesthet Plast Surg & Skin Care Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.PRS.0000060795.16982.1C
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study analyzed the shells of single-lumen silicone gel breast implants within the general context of device durability in vivo. The investigation included the major types of get-filled implants that were manufactured in the United States in a 30-year period. The implants analyzed were Cronin seamed (two explants and one control), Silastic 0 and Silastic 1 (18 explants and seven controls), and Silastic 11 (22 explants and 43 controls). The biodurability of the explants was investigated with measurements of the mechanical and chemical properties of the various types of silicone gel control and explanted shells, with implantation times ranging from 3 months to 32 years. The shell properties measured for the controls and explants included the stress-strain relationships, tensile strength, elongation, tear resistance, moduli, cross-link density, and amount of extractable material in the shell. In addition, the mechanical properties of shells that had been extracted with hexane were analyzed for both explants and control implants. The silicone gel explants; investigated in this study included some of the oldest explants of the various major types that have been tested to date. For assessment of long-term implantation effects, the data obtained in this study were combined with all known data from other institutions on the various major types of gel implants. The study also addressed the failure mechanisms associated with silicone gel breast implants. The results of the study demonstrated that silicone gel implants have remained intact for 32 years in vivo and that degradation of the shell mechanical and chemical properties is not a primary mechanism for silicone gel breast implant failure.
引用
收藏
页码:2295 / 2306
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Bondurant S., 1999, SAFETY SILICONE BREA
  • [2] ROLE OF PARTICULATE FILLERS IN ELASTOMER REINFORCEMENT - REVIEW
    BOONSTRA, BB
    [J]. POLYMER, 1979, 20 (06) : 691 - 704
  • [3] Brandon H., 2000, AESTHET SURG J, V20, P122
  • [4] Brandon Harold J, 2003, J Long Term Eff Med Implants, V13, P49, DOI 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v13.i1.60
  • [5] In vivo aging characteristics of silicone gel breast implants compared to lot-matched controls
    Brandon, HJ
    Jerina, KL
    Wolf, CJ
    Young, VL
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (06) : 1927 - 1933
  • [6] Brandon HJ, 2002, ANN PLAS SURG, V49, P242
  • [7] Variability in the properties of silicone gel breast implants
    Brandon, HJ
    Young, VL
    Jerina, KL
    Wolf, CJ
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (03) : 647 - 655
  • [8] Scanning electron microscopy characterization of surgical instrument damage to breast implants
    Brandon, HJ
    Young, VL
    Jerina, KL
    Wolf, CJ
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [9] Brandon HJ, 1999, AESTHETIC SURG J, V19, P197
  • [10] BRANDON HJ, 1999, AESTHETIC SURG J, V19, P381