Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis

被引:37
作者
Desai, Michael M. [1 ]
Weissman, Daniel
Feldman, Marcus W.
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Lewis Sigler Inst Intergrat Genom, Carl Icahn Lab, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1534/genetics.107.075812
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The accumulation of deleterious mutations plays a major role in evolution, and key to this are the interactions between their fitness effects, known as epistasis. Whether mutations tend to interact synergistically (with multiple mutations being more deleterious than would be expected from their individual fitness effects) or antagonistically is important for a variety of evolutionary questions, particularly the evolution of sex. Unfortunately, the experimental evidence on the prevalence and strength of epistasis is mixed and inconclusive. Here we study theoretically whether synergistic or antagonistic epistasis is likely to be favored by evolution and by how much. We find that in the presence of recombination, evolution favors less synergistic or more antagonistic epistasis whenever mutations that change the epistasis in this direction are possible. This is because evolution favors increased buffering against the effects of deleterious mutations. This suggests that we should not expect synergistic epistasis to be widespread in nature and hence that the mutational deterministic hypothesis for the advantage of sex may not apply widely.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1010
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks [J].
Azevedo, RBR ;
Lohaus, R ;
Srinivasan, S ;
Dang, KK ;
Burch, CL .
NATURE, 2006, 440 (7080) :87-90
[2]   A GENERAL-MODEL FOR THE EVOLUTION OF RECOMBINATION [J].
BARTON, NH .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 65 (02) :123-144
[3]   Evidence for positive epistasis in HIV-1 [J].
Bonhoeffer, S ;
Chappey, C ;
Parkin, NT ;
Whitcomb, JM ;
Petropoulos, CJ .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5701) :1547-1550
[4]   Epistasis and its relationship to canalization in the RNA virus φ6 [J].
Burch, CL ;
Chao, L .
GENETICS, 2004, 167 (02) :559-567
[5]   The role of epistatic gene interactions in the response to selection and the evolution of evolvability [J].
Carter, AJR ;
Hermisson, J ;
Hansen, TF .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 68 (03) :179-196
[6]   MUTATION-SELECTION BALANCE AND THE EVOLUTIONARY ADVANTAGE OF SEX AND RECOMBINATION [J].
CHARLESWORTH, B .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1990, 55 (03) :199-221
[7]   The effect of sex and deleterious mutations on fitness in Chlamydomonas [J].
deVisser, JAGM ;
Hoekstra, RF ;
VandenEnde, H .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1367) :193-200
[8]  
deVisser JAGM, 1997, GENETICS, V145, P815
[9]  
deVisser JAGM, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P1499, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01473.x
[10]   Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria [J].
Elena, SF ;
Lenski, RE .
NATURE, 1997, 390 (6658) :395-398