Fundamental studies of granule consolidation - Part 2. Quantifying the effects of particle and binder properties

被引:97
作者
Iveson, SM [1 ]
Litster, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Dept Chem Engn, Ctr Multiphase Proc, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
granulation; agglomeration; consolidation; inter-particle friction; capillary forces; viscous dissipation; impact deformation; dynamic yield stress;
D O I
10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00116-8
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Glass ballotini of surface mean size 10, 19 and 37 mu m were granulated in a 30 cm diameter tumbling drum. Water, glycerol and surfactant solutions used to vary the viscosity and surface tension of the binder liquid. The change of porosity with time was found to be well described by a simple, empirical, exponential decay equation: epsilon-epsilon(min)/epsilon(0)-epsilon(min) = exp(-kN) where epsilon is the average granule porosity after N drum revolutions, epsilon(0) is the initial average porosity of the feed, epsilon(min) is the minimum porosity reached by the tumbling granules and k is the consolidation rate constant. epsilon(min) and k were complex functions of binder and solid properties-decreasing particle size and increasing liquid viscosity both reduced k; decreasing surface tension increased epsilon(min); and the effect of binder content on epsilon(min) varied with binder viscosity. Where possible, these relationships were expressed quantitatively and compared with consolidation models in the literature. k was also related to the previously measured dynamic yield stress of the granules. The results show that capillary, viscous and friction forces all play a role in granule consolidation. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 250
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PERRYS CHEM ENG HDB
[2]  
Capes C. E., 1980, HDB POWDER TECHNOLOG, V1
[3]   A MICROLEVEL-BASED CHARACTERIZATION OF GRANULATION PHENOMENA [J].
ENNIS, BJ ;
TARDOS, G ;
PFEFFER, R .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 65 (1-3) :257-272
[4]   Fundamental studies of granule consolidation .1. Effects of binder content and binder viscosity [J].
Iveson, SM ;
Litster, JD ;
Ennis, BJ .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 88 (01) :15-20
[5]   Liquid-bound granule impact deformation and coefficient of restitution [J].
Iveson, SM ;
Litster, JD .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 99 (03) :234-242
[6]   Growth regime map for liquid-bound granules [J].
Iveson, SM ;
Litster, JD .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1998, 44 (07) :1510-1518
[7]  
Iveson SM, 1997, THESIS U QUEENSLAND
[8]  
Kapur P.C., 1978, ADV CHEM ENG, V10, P55
[9]   A COALESCENCE MODEL FOR GRANULATION [J].
KAPUR, PC ;
FUERSTEN.DW .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY PROCESS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, 1969, 8 (01) :56-&
[10]   MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES OF MOIST AGGLOMERATES IN RELATION TO GRANULATION MECHANISMS .1. DEFORMABILITY OF MOIST, DENSIFIED AGGLOMERATES [J].
KRISTENSEN, HG ;
HOLM, P ;
SCHAEFER, T .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 1985, 44 (03) :227-237