Reactions to affirmative action: Substance and semantics

被引:29
作者
Golden, H
Hinkle, S
Crosby, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Psychol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Social Work, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02483.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
For both theoretical and practical reasons, researchers have sought to map the motivations that underlie people's support for or opposition to affirmative action. In view of the amount of rhetoric surrounding the issues, it is possible that some of the apparent differences in degrees of support come from differences in how the words affirmative action are interpreted. The present investigation shows that the meanings that people ascribe to affirmative action statistically predict their attitudes toward the policy, even after one accounts for demographic and related attitudinal factors. The implications of our findings are important in both applied and conceptual ways.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 88
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1996, AFF ACT WHO BEN
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM BLACK WHITE 1 NAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], WHITE READINGS RACE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SOC JUSTICE RES, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02334826
[5]  
[Anonymous], RES LABOR EC
[6]  
Bergmann B., 1996, DEFENSE AFFIRMATIVE
[7]   OPPOSITION TO RACE-TARGETING - SELF-INTEREST, STRATIFICATION IDEOLOGY, OR RACIAL-ATTITUDES [J].
BOBO, L ;
KLUEGEL, JR .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 58 (04) :443-464
[8]  
Bowen W.G., 1998, The Shape of the River: Long[Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions
[9]  
Carter S. L., 1991, REFLECTIONS AFFIRMAT
[10]  
*CAT, 1998, WOM COL CORP MAN DYN