Mail surveys can achieve high response rates in a dermatology patient population

被引:11
作者
Filip, JC [1 ]
Ming, ME [1 ]
Levy, RM [1 ]
Hoffstad, OJ [1 ]
Margolis, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
epidemiology; survey; atopic dermatitis;
D O I
10.1046/j.0022-202X.2003.22130.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
In order to understand the burden of skin disease on patient populations, researchers need to be able to measure exposures and outcomes of interest in a population-based study. One method of obtaining such information is mailed patient surveys. This method of obtaining information, however, raises concerns regarding possible low response rates, and to the best of our knowledge, this method has not been attempted in large dermatology patient populations with a high response rate. We sought to determine whether using a slightly modified version of the Dillman Total Design Method as a mailed survey protocol would result in a high response rate in a dermatology population. A mail survey was sent using a slightly modified version of Dillman's Total Design Method to 4894 patients seen in the Dermatology Department of the University of Pennsylvania, who were diagnosed with nonmelanoma skin cancer, dermatophytosis, acne rosacea, seborrheic keratosis, or warts; 74.1% of the subjects responded to the mailings; 69.8% (n=3203) of patients returned a completed survey. Response rates (both as overall response and as survey completers only) were high across a wide spectrum of dermatologic illnesses and did not vary significantly by entry diagnosis. Dillman's Total Design Method appears to be an effective tool for researchers studying the burden of skin disease in a large sample of dermatology patients.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 43
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[2]   THE BEHAVIOR OF RESPONDENTS, NONRESPONDENTS, AND REFUSERS ACROSS MAIL SURVEYS [J].
BRENNAN, M ;
HOEK, J .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1992, 56 (04) :530-535
[3]   ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES - A METAANALYSIS [J].
CHURCH, AH .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1993, 57 (01) :62-79
[4]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE
[5]  
Dillman DA, 2000, Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, V2
[6]   Nonresponse in a community cohort study - Predictors and consequences for exposure-disease associations [J].
Eagan, TML ;
Eide, GE ;
Gulsvik, A ;
Bakke, PS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (08) :775-781
[7]   Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey [J].
Etter, JF ;
Perneger, TV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1123-1128
[8]   MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATE - A META-ANALYSIS OF SELECTED TECHNIQUES FOR INDUCING RESPONSE [J].
FOX, RJ ;
CRASK, MR ;
KIM, J .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1988, 52 (04) :467-491
[9]   UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN A SURVEY [J].
GROVES, RM ;
CIALDINI, RB ;
COUPER, MP .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1992, 56 (04) :475-495
[10]   Determinants of mail-survey response: Survey design factors and respondent factors [J].
Helgeson, JG ;
Voss, KE ;
Terpening, WD .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2002, 19 (03) :303-328