Technology acquisition channels and industry performance: An industry-level analysis of Chinese large- and medium-size manufacturing enterprises

被引:69
作者
Bin, Guo [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
technology acquisition; industry performance; R&D spillover; manufacturing industry;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Through an industry-level analysis of Chinese large- and medium-size manufacturing enterprises over the period of 1996-2001, this article investigates the direct and interactive contributions of four technology acquisition channels to industry performances in terms of innovation performance and productivity. These channels include in-house R&D, foreign technology transfer, domestic technology transfer, and inter-industry R&D spillover. We have found evidence of an important role of inter-industry R&D spillover in shaping and improving industry performance in China, which has been neglected by previous empirical studies concerned with Chinese industrial firms. The empirical results indicate that inter-industry R&D spillover and foreign technology transfer make significant contributions to both labour productivity and the level of total factor productivity in Chinese manufacturing industries. We have also found that in-house R&D and inter-industry R&D spillover share a complementary relationship in shaping innovation performance and total factor productivity in Chinese industry, and that in-house R&D relates to foreign technology transfer as a complement for labour productivity. Finally, on the mixed results among existing literature in the context of developing countries, this article argues that the commonly followed strategy in technology development, combined with government regulations, will play an essential role in determining the relationship between in-house R&D and foreign technology transfer. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 209
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Albuquerque EDE, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P1047
[2]   The effects of R&D, foreign technology purchase, and domestic and international spillovers on productivity in Indian firms [J].
Basant, R ;
Fikkert, B .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1996, 78 (02) :187-199
[3]  
BELL M., 1993, Industrial and Corporate Change, V2, n, P157, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/2.1.157
[4]   TECHNOLOGICAL IMPORTS AND TECHNOLOGICAL EFFORT - AN ANALYSIS OF THEIR DETERMINANTS IN BRAZILIAN FIRMS [J].
BRAGA, H ;
WILLMORE, L .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1991, 39 (04) :421-432
[5]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[6]  
EVENSON RE, 1989, ESTIMATING PATENTS I
[7]   PATENT STATISTICS AS ECONOMIC INDICATORS - A SURVEY [J].
GRILICHES, Z .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 1990, 28 (04) :1661-1707
[8]   ISSUES IN ASSESSING THE CONTRIBUTION OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TO PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH [J].
GRILICHES, Z .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1979, 10 (01) :92-116
[9]   EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY IN FRENCH MANUFACTURING FIRMS [J].
HALL, BH ;
MAIRESSE, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 65 (01) :263-293
[10]  
Hanel, 2000, ECON SYST RES, V12, P345, DOI DOI 10.1080/09535310050120925