Updating quality control assays in the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory with a cryopreserved hamster oocyte DNA cytogenotoxic assay

被引:7
作者
Chan, PJ [1 ]
Calinisan, JH [1 ]
Corselli, JU [1 ]
Patton, WC [1 ]
King, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Loma Linda, CA 92350 USA
关键词
single-cell gel electrophoresis; comet assay; quality control; hamster ova; in vitro fertilization;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009472323011
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 [遗传学]; 090102 [作物遗传育种];
摘要
Purpose: Despite advances in assisted reproduction, there is no progress in (quality control bioassays. The objectives were to develop a comet assay to measure DNA fragmentation in thawed cryopreserved oocytes and compare this assay with one-cell mouse embryo bioassay. Methods: Thawed hamster oocytes from a commercial source were incubated in culture media with either 0-, 50-, or 100-muM hydrogen peroxide, or, in media exposed to different contact materials and unknown proficiency analytes. Incubation time was 1.5 h at 37 degreesC. The oocytes were dried filed, stained with acridine orange, embedded in a mini-agarose layer and electrophoresis was carried out. Fluorescent images were analyzed The results were compared with standard one-cell mouse assay data. Results: The 100-muM hydrogen peroxide treatment caused greatest DNA fragmentation in the hamster oocytes at Hours 1 and 2. A dose response was observed. Intrassay coefficient of variation was 5.7%. Only one of the five materials tested passed both assays The data for the unknown proficiency analytes were similar for both assays Conclusions: The oocyte comet assay demonstrated DNA fragmentation in the presence of toxic substances. The detection of toxicity in two materials that passed the mouse bioassay suggested increased sensitivity in the new assay The oocyte comet assay and the mouse bioassay results marched in the proficiency test. However, more studies are still needed to determine optimal sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
CULTURE OF MOUSE PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYOS AS A QUALITY-CONTROL ASSAY FOR HUMAN INVITRO FERTILIZATION [J].
ACKERMAN, SB ;
SWANSON, RJ ;
STOKES, GK ;
VEECK, LL .
GAMETE RESEARCH, 1984, 9 (02) :145-152
[2]
A RAPID SPERM MOTILITY BIOASSAY PROCEDURE FOR QUALITY-CONTROL TESTING OF WATER AND CULTURE MEDIA [J].
BAVISTER, BD ;
ANDREWS, JC .
JOURNAL OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYO TRANSFER, 1988, 5 (02) :67-75
[3]
A NEW CELL-CULTURE ASSAY FOR QUALITY-CONTROL IN IVF [J].
BERTHEUSSEN, K ;
HOLST, N ;
FORSDAHL, F ;
HOIE, KE .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1989, 4 (05) :531-535
[4]
CONDONMAHONY M, 1985, FERTIL STERIL, V44, P521
[5]
QUALITY-CONTROL IN AN INVITRO FERTILIZATION LABORATORY - USE OF HUMAN-SPERM SURVIVAL STUDIES [J].
CRITCHLOW, JD ;
MATSON, PL ;
NEWMAN, MC ;
HORNE, G ;
TROUP, SA ;
LIEBERMAN, BA .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1989, 4 (05) :545-549
[6]
DAVIDSON A, 1988, FERTIL STERIL, V49, P516
[7]
THE COMET ASSAY - A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW [J].
FAIRBAIRN, DW ;
OLIVE, PL ;
ONEILL, KL .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN GENETIC TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 339 (01) :37-59
[8]
FLEMING TP, 1987, FERTIL STERIL, V47, P858
[9]
INFLUENCE OF WATER-QUALITY ON INVITRO FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT FOR THE MOUSE [J].
FUKUDA, A ;
NODA, Y ;
TSUKUI, S ;
MATSUMOTO, H ;
YANO, J ;
MORI, T .
JOURNAL OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYO TRANSFER, 1987, 4 (01) :40-45
[10]
GORRILL MJ, 1991, FERTIL STERIL, V55, P345