Beyond contact: Intergroup contact in the context of power relations

被引:173
作者
Saguy, Tamar [1 ]
Dovidio, John F. [2 ]
Pratto, Felicia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
group position; group power; change motivation; contact;
D O I
10.1177/0146167207311200
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This work investigated how group-based power affects the motivations and preferences that members of advantaged and disadvantaged groups bring to situations of contact. To measure the preferred content of interactions, desires to address particular topics in intergroup contact were assessed for both experimental groups (Study 1) and real groups (Study 2). As predicted, across both studies, the desire to talk about power was greater among members of disadvantaged than of advantaged groups. This difference was mediated by motivation for change in group-based power. Study 2 further demonstrated that more highly identified members of disadvantaged groups wanted to talk about power more. Members of advantaged groups generally preferred to talk about commonalities between the groups more than about group-based power, and this desire was greater with higher levels of identification. However, perceiving that their group's advantage was illegitimate increased the desire of advantaged group members to address power in intergroup interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 445
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
[2]  
Allport G.W., 1979, The nature of prejudice', V25th
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   An integrative theory of intergroup contact [J].
Brown, R ;
Hewstone, M .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 37, 2005, 37 :255-343
[5]   The protestant work ethic and attributions of responsibility: Applications of triangle model [J].
Christopher, AN ;
Schlenker, BR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 35 (07) :1502-1518
[6]  
Cohen J., 2013, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI0219, 10.4324/ 9780203774441, DOI 10.4324/9780203774441, 10.1002/0471264385.wei0219]
[7]  
DANIEL JL, 1988, DISCOURSE DISCRIMINA, P23
[8]  
DEMOULIN S, IN PRESS INTERGROUP
[9]  
Doosje B., 1999, Social identity: Context, commitment, content, P84
[10]  
Doosje B.J., 2004, COLLECTIVE GUILT, P95