A robust optimization approach to energy and reserve dispatch in electricity markets

被引:139
作者
Zugno, Marco [1 ]
Conejo, Antonio J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Dept Integrated Syst Engn, Baker Syst Engn 286, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
OR in energy; Robust optimization; Decomposition; Electricity market; Renewable energy; UNIT COMMITMENT; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.081
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
120117 [社会管理工程];
摘要
To a large extent, electricity markets worldwide still rely on deterministic procedures for clearing energy and reserve auctions. However, increasing shares of the production mix consist of renewable sources whose nature is stochastic and non-dispatchable, as their output is uncertain and cannot be controlled by the operators of the production units. Stochastic programming models allow the joint determination of the day-ahead energy and reserve dispatch accounting for the uncertainty in the output from these sources. However, the size of these models gets quickly out of hand as a large number of scenarios are needed to properly represent the uncertainty. In this work, we take an alternative approach and cast the problem as an adaptive robust optimization problem. The resulting day-ahead energy and reserve schedules yield the minimum system cost, accounting for the cost of the redispatch decisions at the balancing (real-time) stage, in the worst-case realization of the stochastic production within a specified uncertainty set. We propose a novel reformulation of the problem that allows considering general polyhedral uncertainty sets. In a case-study, we show that, in comparison to a risk-averse stochastic programming model, the robust optimization approach progressively trades off optimality in expectation with improved performance in terms of risk. These differences, however, gradually taper off as the level of risk-aversion increases for the stochastic programming approach. Computational studies show that the robust optimization model scales well with the size of the power system, which is promising in view of real-world applications of this approach. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. and Association of European Operational Research Societies (EURO) within the International Federation of Operational Research Societies (IFORS). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 671
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
[Anonymous], SERIES OPERATIONS RE
[2]
[Anonymous], 2014, INT SERIES OPERATION
[3]
Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Litvinov, Eugene ;
Sun, Xu Andy ;
Zhao, Jinye ;
Zheng, Tongxin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (01) :52-63
[4]
Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Brown, David B. ;
Caramanis, Constantine .
SIAM REVIEW, 2011, 53 (03) :464-501
[5]
Conejo A. J., 2006, DECOMPOSITION TECHNI, P197
[6]
Espejo A., 2011, DIRECTIONAL CALIBRAT, P1
[7]
A REPRESENTATION AND ECONOMIC INTERPRETATION OF A 2-LEVEL PROGRAMMING PROBLEM [J].
FORTUNYAMAT, J ;
MCCARL, B .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1981, 32 (09) :783-792
[8]
Furini F., 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT
[9]
Gabriel S. A., 2012, COMPLEMENTARITY MODE, V180, P221
[10]
The IEEE reliability test system - 1996 [J].
Grigg, C ;
Wong, P ;
Albrecht, P ;
Allan, R ;
Bhavaraju, M ;
Billinton, R ;
Chen, Q ;
Fong, C ;
Haddad, S ;
Kuruganty, S ;
Li, W ;
Mukerji, R ;
Patton, D ;
Rau, N ;
Reppen, D ;
Schneider, A ;
Shahidehpour, M ;
Singh, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1999, 14 (03) :1010-1018