共 38 条
Second-line chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: Results of a retrospective multicenter survey
被引:77
作者:
Zucali, P. A.
[1
]
Simonelli, M.
[1
]
Michetti, G.
[2
]
Tiseo, M.
[3
]
Ceresoli, G. L.
[4
]
Collova, E.
[5
]
Follador, A.
[6
]
Lo Dico, M.
[7
]
Moretti, A.
[8
]
De Vincenzo, F.
[1
]
Lorenzi, E.
[1
]
Perrino, M.
[1
]
Giordano, L.
[9
]
Farina, G.
[8
]
Santoro, A.
[1
]
Garassino, M.
[8
]
机构:
[1] Humanitas Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Rozzano, Italy
[2] Osped Riuniti Bergamo, Pneumol Unit, I-24100 Bergamo, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Parma, Med Oncol Unit, Parma, Italy
[4] Humanitas Gavazzeni, Med Oncol Unit, Bergamo, Italy
[5] Osped Civile, Med Oncol Unit, Legnano, Italy
[6] Azienda Osped Univ, Dept Oncol, Udine, Italy
[7] Azienda Osped Livorno, Med Oncol Unit, Livorno, Italy
[8] Osped Fatebenefratelli & Oftalm, Med Oncol Unit, Milan, Italy
[9] Humanitas Canc Ctr, Biostat Unit, Rozzano, Italy
来源:
关键词:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma;
Second-line therapy;
Pemetrexed;
Re-treatment;
Progression-free survival;
Disease control;
EXPANDED ACCESS PROGRAM;
PEMETREXED PLUS CARBOPLATIN;
PHASE-III TRIAL;
1ST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY;
EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION;
PRETREATED PATIENTS;
CISPLATIN;
GEMCITABINE;
COMBINATION;
MANAGEMENT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.08.011
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要:
The pemetrexed-cisplatin chemotherapy is standard of care in first-line (FL) treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The second-line (SL) chemotherapy is considered, but the optimal treatment has not been defined yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SL-therapy in a series of MPM-patients included in a retrospective multicenter database. Clinical records of MPM-patients who received SL-treatment from 1996 to 2008 were reviewed. Study endpoints were response, overall-survival (OS), and progression-free-survival (PFS) for SL, stratified for patient characteristics, FL-outcomes, and type of SL Out of 423 patients, 181 with full clinical data were identified. Patients' characteristics: median-age 64 years (range: 36-85); male gender 115 (63.5%); good EORTC-score 109 (60.2%); epithelial histology 135 (74.6%). After FL, 147 (81.2%) patients achieved disease-control (DC) and 45 had a time-to-progression >= 12 months (TTP >= 12). After SL, 95 patients (52.6%) achieved DC (21 response; 74 stable-disease); median PFS and OS were 4.3 and 8.7 months, respectively. According to multivariate analysis, DC after SL-therapy was significantly related to pemetrexed-based treatment (OR: 2.46; p = 0.017) and FL-17P >= 12 (OR: 3.50; p = 0.006). PFS was related to younger age (<65 years) (HR: 0.70; p = 0.045), ECOG-PS0 (HR: 0.67; p = 0.022), and FL-TTP >= 12 (HR: 0.45; p<0.001). OS was significantly related to ECOG-PS0 (HR: 0.43; p<0.001) and to FL-TTP >= 12 (HR: 0.54; p = 0.005). In pemetrexed pre-treated patients, re-treatment with a pemetrexed/platinum combination significantly reduced the risk-of-death than pemetrexed alone (HR: 0.11; p<0.001). In conclusion, SL-chemotherapy seems to be active in MPM-patients, particularly in younger patients with ECOG-PS0 and prolonged TIP after FLpemetrexed-based chemotherapy. In selected patients, re-challenge with pemetrexed-based regimens, preferentially associated with platinum-compound, appears to be an option for SL-setting. Considering the important limitations of this study, due to retrospective nature and the possible selection bias, prospective clinical trials are warranted to clarify these issues. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 367
页数:8
相关论文

