Diverse preparation methods for small intestinal submucosa (SIS): Decellularization, components, and structure

被引:72
作者
Ji, Yanhui [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Jinge [2 ]
Sun, Tingfang [2 ]
Tang, Kai [2 ]
Xiong, Zekang [2 ]
Ren, Zhengwei [2 ]
Yao, Sheng [2 ]
Chen, Kaifang [2 ]
Yang, Fan [2 ]
Zhu, Fengzhao [2 ]
Guo, Xiaodong [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthopaed, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
small intestinal submucosa; decellularization; extracellular matrix; EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX HYDROGELS; BIOLOGIC SCAFFOLDS; GROWTH; STERILIZATION; ENHANCE; TISSUES; ECM;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.a.36582
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
The native extracellular matrix (ECM) biomaterial derived from small intestinal submucosa (SIS) is widely applied in tissue engineering for tissue repair and regeneration. SIS ECM is obtained through physical and chemical methods to remove the intrinsic cells, which would otherwise cause adverse immune reactions when the SIS ECM is implanted into the host body. Several research teams have reported diverse SIS decellularization methods. However, there was no consensus on the criteria to be used for the decellularization methods for SIS and further research on the mechanism action of SIS is needed for comprehensive detection of the biological composition. In this present study, we used three reported methods to prepare SIS and compared their effects on decellularization and the remaining biological components, microstructure and cytocompatibility. SIS prepared by the three kinds of decellularization methods all achieved the recommended criteria, had good biocompatibility and retained most active components. Nevertheless, regardless of which decellularization method was used, the microstructure and bioactive components of the prepared SIS were damaged in varying degrees. We recommend that researchers need to select a decellularization method that would be appropriate to use according to their research purposes. (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 689-697, 2019.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 697
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response [J].
Aamodt, Joseph M. ;
Grainger, David W. .
BIOMATERIALS, 2016, 86 :68-82
[2]
Abraham GA, 2000, J BIOMED MATER RES, V51, P442, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<442::AID-JBM19>3.0.CO
[3]
2-4
[5]
SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA AS A LARGE DIAMETER VASCULAR GRAFT IN THE DOG [J].
BADYLAK, SF ;
LANTZ, GC ;
COFFEY, A ;
GEDDES, LA .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 47 (01) :74-80
[6]
The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material [J].
Badylak, Stephen F. .
BIOMATERIALS, 2007, 28 (25) :3587-3593
[7]
Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function [J].
Badylak, Stephen F. ;
Freytes, Donald O. ;
Gilbert, Thomas W. .
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2009, 5 (01) :1-13
[8]
The basement membrane component of biologic scaffolds derived from extracellular matrix [J].
Brown, B ;
Lindberg, K ;
Reing, J ;
Stolz, DB ;
Badylak, SF .
TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2006, 12 (03) :519-526
[9]
Small bowel tissue engineering using small intestinal submucosa as a scaffold [J].
Chen, MK ;
Badylak, SF .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 99 (02) :352-358
[10]
An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes [J].
Crapo, Peter M. ;
Gilbert, Thomas W. ;
Badylak, Stephen F. .
BIOMATERIALS, 2011, 32 (12) :3233-3243