Ceptometer Deployment Method Affects Measurement of Fraction of Intercepted Photosynthetically Active Radiation

被引:15
作者
Johnson, Mari-Vaughn V. [1 ]
Kiniry, James R. [1 ]
Burson, Byron L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] ARS, USDA, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
关键词
LEAF-AREA INDEX; LIGHT; ACCUMULATION; REGISTRATION; REFLECTANCE; COMMUNITIES; CLIMATE; ENERGY; CROPS;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2009.0478
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The fraction of photosynthetically active radiation a canopy intercepts (fiPAR) drives canopy level photosynthesis. There is currently no universal, repeatable fiPAR sensor deployment method. We show variability of fiPAR measurements by three sensor deployment methods, including two 1 by 1 m and one 3 by 1 m method. The deployment method biased measurements (P = 0.005) under buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare L) canopies. These effects were less evident in 'Alamo' switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L) and miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus). Canopies of these two species showed deployment method x nutrient addition interaction effects (P = 0.02), apparently driven by nutrient effects on leaf area index (LAI). We highlight potential implications of using the different deployment methods via an exercise in the application of Beer's law. As actual LAI increased, effect of deployment method on fiPAR measurements tended to diminish, suggesting in high LAI systems a universal deployment method is not as critical as it is in low LAI systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1132 / 1137
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   STAND STRUCTURE AND LIGHT PENETRATION .2. A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSON, MC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1966, 3 (01) :41-+
[2]   Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception [J].
Andrade, FH ;
Calviño, P ;
Cirilo, A ;
Barbieri, P .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (05) :975-980
[3]   Potential ecological distribution of alien invasive species and risk assessment:: a case study of buffel grass in arid regions of Mexico [J].
Arriaga, L ;
Castellanos, AE ;
Moreno, E ;
Alarcón, J .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (06) :1504-1514
[4]   ESTIMATING ABSORBED PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AND LEAF-AREA INDEX FROM SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE IN WHEAT [J].
ASRAR, G ;
FUCHS, M ;
KANEMASU, ET ;
HATFIELD, JL .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (02) :300-306
[5]   Leaf orientation and distribution in a Phaseolus vulgaris L-crop and their relation to light microclimate [J].
Barradas, VL ;
Jones, HG ;
Clark, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 1999, 43 (02) :64-70
[6]   REGISTRATION OF NUECES AND LLANO BUFFELGRASS [J].
BASHAW, EC .
CROP SCIENCE, 1980, 20 (01) :112-112
[7]  
Beer, 1852, ANN PHYS-NEW YORK, V162, P78, DOI DOI 10.1002/ANDP.18521620505
[8]   Ground-based measurements of leaf area index:: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies [J].
Bréda, NJJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2003, 54 (392) :2403-2417
[9]  
Burgess T.L., 1991, MADRO O, V38, P96
[10]  
Búrquez-Montijo A, 2002, AZ S DES M, P126