Probing the links between in vitro potency, ADMET and physicochemical parameters

被引:370
作者
Gleeson, M. Paul [1 ]
Hersey, Anne [2 ]
Montanari, Dino [3 ]
Overington, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
[2] EMBL EBI European Bioinformat Inst, Hinxton CB10 1SD, Cambs, England
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Med Res Ctr, Neurosci CEDD, I-37135 Verona, Italy
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
DRUG-LIKE; LIGAND EFFICIENCY; PROPERTY PROFILES; LEAD-LIKE; DISCOVERY; PERMEABILITY; OPINION; DESIGN; TIME; SET;
D O I
10.1038/nrd3367
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A common underlying assumption in current drug discovery strategies is that compounds with higher in vitro potency at their target(s) have greater potential to translate into successful, low-dose therapeutics. This has led to the development of screening cascades with in vitro potency embedded as an early filter. However, this approach is beginning to be questioned, given the bias in physicochemical properties that it can introduce early in lead generation and optimization, which is due to the often diametrically opposed relationship between physicochemical parameters associated with high in vitro potency and those associated with desirable absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) characteristics. Here, we describe analyses that probe these issues further using the ChEMBL database, which includes more than 500,000 drug discovery and marketed oral drug compounds. Key findings include: first, that oral drugs seldom possess nanomolar potency (50nM on average); second, that many oral drugs have considerable off-target activity; and third, that in vitro potency does not correlate strongly with the therapeutic dose. These findings suggest that the perceived benefit of high in vitro potency may be negated by poorer ADMET properties.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 208
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Ligand efficiency indices as guideposts for drug discovery [J].
Abad-Zapatero, C ;
Metz, JT .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2005, 10 (07) :464-469
[2]   FUNCTIONAL-GROUP CONTRIBUTIONS TO DRUG RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS [J].
ANDREWS, PR ;
CRAIK, DJ ;
MARTIN, JL .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1984, 27 (12) :1648-1657
[3]  
AZZAOUI K, CHEM MED CHEM, V2, P874
[4]   A rule of three for fragment-based lead discovery? [J].
Congreve, M ;
Carr, R ;
Murray, C ;
Jhoti, H .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2003, 8 (19) :876-877
[5]   Opinion - Drug-target residence time and its implications for lead optimization [J].
Copeland, Robert A. ;
Pompliano, David L. ;
Meek, Thomas D. .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2006, 5 (09) :730-739
[6]   The discovery of tadalafil:: A novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor.: 1:: 5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,3(2H)-dione analogues [J].
Daugan, A ;
Grondin, P ;
Ruault, C ;
de Gouville, ACL ;
Coste, H ;
Kirilovsky, J ;
Hyafil, F ;
Labaudinière, R .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 46 (21) :4525-4532
[7]   Components of successful lead generation [J].
Davis, AM ;
Keeling, DJ ;
Steele, J ;
Tomkinson, NP ;
Tinker, AC .
CURRENT TOPICS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 5 (04) :421-439
[8]   Avoiding physicochemical artefacts in early ADME-Tox experiments [J].
DeWitte, Robert S. .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2006, 11 (17-18) :855-859
[9]  
Di L, 2005, CURR OPIN DRUG DISC, V8, P495
[10]   Reaching Out to Collaborators: Crowdsourcing for Pharmaceutical Research [J].
Ekins, Sean ;
Williams, Antony J. .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 27 (03) :393-395