The influence of vision on computerized neurobehavioral test scores: A proposal for improving test protocols

被引:29
作者
Hudnell, HK
Otto, DA
House, DE
机构
[1] US EPA, DIV NEUROTOXICOL, HUMAN STUDIES DIV, RES TRIANGLE PK, NC 27711 USA
[2] US EPA, DIV NEUROTOXICOL, RES SUPPORT DIV, RES TRIANGLE PK, NC 27711 USA
关键词
visual contrast sensitivity; computerized tests; neurobehavior; neurotoxicity; analysis of covariance; microelectronic workers; children; solvents;
D O I
10.1016/0892-0362(96)00040-2
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Computerized tests of neurobehavioral function are frequently administered in neurotoxicological studies with little attention given to the optical properties of test stimuli or to the vision of subjects. Yet many test stimuli are small or briefly presented, and test endpoints often involve short reaction times. Stimulus detection and reaction time are known to be strongly dependent upon stimulus luminance, contrast, and size, as well as on the suject's visual abilities. The current study assessed the influence of visual contrast sensitivity on Neurobehavioral Evaluation System 2 (NES2) test results in three data sets. Analyses indicated that vision was associated with up to 24% of the variance (Hand-Eye Coordination test) in NES2 scores, even when visual acuity was normal, and that vision often influenced the significance of group differences. It is suggested that researchers measure the luminance, contrast, and size of test stimuli, the distance from the subject's eyes to the monitor, and the subject's visual contrast sensitivity. The measurement and control of stimulus parameters and the inclusion of visual function scores in analysis models could reduce the variability among computerized test scores both within and between studies. Models that assess the influence of vision on computerized test results may help to identify the CNS domains and specialized functions adversely affected by neurotoxicant exposures.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 400
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   VISUAL REACTION-TIME OF CATS TO DIFFERENT SPATIAL-FREQUENCIES [J].
AIKEN, BE ;
LOOP, MS .
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1990, 5 (06) :557-564
[2]  
AMLER RW, 1995, ADULT ENV NEUROBEHAV, P31
[3]   NEUROBEHAVIORAL TEST METHODS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH STUDIES OF ADULTS [J].
ANGER, WK ;
LETZ, R ;
CHRISLIP, DW ;
FRUMKIN, H ;
HUDNELL, K ;
RUSSO, JM ;
CHAPPELL, W ;
HUTCHINSON, L .
NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 1994, 16 (05) :489-497
[4]  
ANGER WK, 1993, NATO ADV SCI INST SE, V250, P159
[5]  
ARDEN G, 1979, J AM OPTOM ASSOC, V50, P35
[6]   IMPORTANCE OF MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN CASES OF VISUAL DISTURBANCE [J].
ARDEN, GB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1978, 62 (04) :198-209
[7]   TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SUMMATION IN HUMAN VISION AT DIFFERENT BACKGROUND INTENSITIES [J].
BARLOW, HB .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1958, 141 (02) :337-350
[8]   STIMULUS SPECIFICITY IN HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM [J].
BLAKEMORE, C ;
MUNCEY, JPJ ;
RIDLEY, RM .
VISION RESEARCH, 1973, 13 (10) :1915-1931
[9]   ON EXISTENCE OF NEURONES IN HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM SELECTIVELY SENSITIVE TO ORIENTATION AND SIZE OF RETINAL IMAGES [J].
BLAKEMORE, C ;
CAMPBELL, FW .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1969, 203 (01) :237-+
[10]  
BODISWOLLNER I, 1980, SERIES CRITICAL SURV, V1, P373