Assessing aesthetic relevance: Children's book selection in a digital library

被引:37
作者
Reuter, Kara [1 ]
机构
[1] Worthington Libraries, Worthington, OH 43085 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2007年 / 58卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/asi.20657
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recreational reading among young people is reportedly on the decline in the United States. Some researchers have suggested that supporting children's strategies for book selection is crucial to encouraging children to engage with books, indicating that improving these strategies might increase the amount of reading they do. In response, this study explores how elementary-school children select books for recreational reading using a digital library. The work extends traditional models of relevance assessment with reader-response theory, employing the concept of "aesthetic relevance": the potential of a document to provide a suitable reading experience. Individuals define aesthetic relevance in personal terms and apply it as they assess documents, much as they do in traditional relevance assessment. This study identified a total of 46 factors organized along seven dimensions that influence children's assessment of the aesthetic relevance of books during selection. The analysis yielded differences in the prevalence of the aesthetic-relevance factors that children mention at various stages of book selection. In addition, the children exhibited differences by age and subtle differences by gender in the frequency of mention of various aesthetic-relevance factors. Recommendations drawn from the findings are offered to improve systems design and literacy education in order to enhance children's access to books and to promote recreational reading.
引用
收藏
页码:1745 / 1763
页数:19
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
ANDERSON G, 1985, READ TEACH, V39, P326
[2]  
[Anonymous], NAT REP CARD 4 GRAD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, READ RISK SURV LIT R
[4]  
[Anonymous], TOP NEWS
[5]  
APPLEBEE AN, 1978, CHILD CONCEPTS STORY
[6]  
BARRY CL, 1994, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V45, P149, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:3<149::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-J
[8]   Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison [J].
Barry, CL ;
Schamber, L .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 1998, 34 (2-3) :219-236
[9]  
BEACH R, 1987, RES TEACH ENGL, V21, P286
[10]  
BENTON M, 1999, UNDERSTANDING CHILDR, P81