Adult cancer survivorship care: experiences from the LIVESTRONG centers of excellence network

被引:51
作者
Campbell, Marci K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tessaro, Irene [3 ]
Gellin, Mindy [3 ]
Valle, Carmina G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Golden, Shannon [4 ]
Kaye, Leanne [1 ,2 ]
Ganz, Patricia A. [5 ]
McCabe, Mary S. [6 ]
Jacobs, Linda A. [7 ]
Syrjala, Karen [8 ]
Anderson, Barbara [9 ]
Jones, Alison F. [10 ]
Miller, Kenneth [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Nutr, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Goldsmith Res Grp, Winston Salem, NC USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Biobehav Sci Dept, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[9] Ohio State Univ, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[10] Univ Colorado, Ctr Canc, Aurora, CO USA
[11] Harvard Univ, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Cancer; Cancer survivorship; Chronic care model; Health care; CHRONIC ILLNESS CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11764-011-0180-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background The objectives of this study were to characterize survivorship models of care across eight LIVESTRONG Survivorship Center of Excellence (COE) Network sites and to identify barriers and facilitators influencing survivorship care. Methods Using the framework of the Chronic Care Model (CCM), quantitative and qualitative methods of inquiry were conducted with the COEs. Methods included document reviews, key informant telephone interviews with 39 participants, online Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) surveys with 40 participants, and three site visits. Results Several overarching themes emerged in qualitative interviews and were substantiated by quantitative methods. Health system factors supporting survivorship care include organization and leadership commitment and program champions at various levels of the health care team. System barriers include reimbursement issues, lack of space, and the need for leadership commitment to support changes in clinical practices as well as having program "champions" among clinical staff. Multiple models of care include separate survivorship clinics and integrated models as well as consultative models. COEs' scores on the ACIC survey showed overall "reasonable support" for survivorship care; however, the clinical information system domain was least developed. Although the ACIC findings indicated "reasonable support" for self-management, the qualitative analysis revealed that self-management support was largely limited to health promotion provided in clinic-based education and counseling sessions, with few COEs providing patients with self-management tools and interventions. Conclusions The CCM framework captured experiences and challenges of these COEs and provided insight into the current state of survivorship care in the context of National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers. Findings showed that cancer patients and providers could benefit from clinical information systems that would better identify candidates for survivorship care and provide timely information. In addition, a crucial area for development is self-management support outside of clinical care. Implications for cancer survivors Cancer survivors may benefit from learning about the experience and challenges faced by the eight LIVESTRONG Centers of Excellence in developing programs and models for cancer survivorship care, and these findings may inform patient and caregiver efforts to seek, evaluate, and advocate for quality survivorship programs designed to meet their needs.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 282
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2009, SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2006
[2]
[Anonymous], 2008, AHRQ PUBL
[3]
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness - The chronic care model, part 2 [J].
Bodenheimer, T ;
Wagner, EH ;
Grumbach, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (15) :1909-1914
[4]
Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC): A practical tool to measure quality improvement [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Wagner, EH ;
Glasgow, RE ;
VonKorff, M .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2002, 37 (03) :791-820
[5]
Evidence On The Chronic Care Model In The New Millennium [J].
Coleman, Katie ;
Austin, Brian T. ;
Brach, Cindy ;
Wagner, Edward H. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (01) :75-85
[6]
Feuerstein M, 2011, HLTH CARE CANC SURVI
[7]
Hewitt M., 2005, CANC PATIENT CANC SU
[8]
Community-Based Participatory Research: A Capacity-Building Approach for Policy Advocacy Aimed at Eliminating Health Disparities [J].
Israel, Barbara A. ;
Coombe, Chris M. ;
Cheezum, Rebecca R. ;
Schulz, Amy J. ;
McGranaghan, Robert J. ;
Lichtenstein, Richard ;
Reyes, Angela G. ;
Clement, Jaye ;
Burris, Akosua .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 100 (11) :2094-2102
[9]
*MACC I, 2010, IMPR CHR ILLN CAR
[10]
McCabe Mary S, 2008, Semin Oncol Nurs, V24, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.soncn.2008.05.008