In silico prediction of drug toxicity

被引:199
作者
Dearden, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Pharm & Chem, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1025361621494
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
It is essential, in order to minimise expensive drug failures due to toxicity being found in late development or even in clinical trials, to determine potential toxicity problems as early as possible. In view of the large libraries of compounds now being handled by combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening, identification of putative toxicity is advisable even before synthesis. Thus the use of predictive toxicology is called for. A number of in silico approaches to toxicity prediction are discussed. Quantitative structure-activity relationships ( QSARs), relating mostly to specific chemical classes, have long been used for this purpose, and exist for a wide range of toxicity endpoints. However, QSARs also exist for the prediction of toxicity of very diverse libraries, although often such QSARs are of the classification type; that is, they predict simply whether or not a compound is toxic, and do not give an indication of the level of toxicity. Examples are given of all of these. A number of expert systems are available for toxicity prediction, most of them covering a range of toxicity endpoints. Those discussed include TOPKAT, CASE, DEREK, HazardExpert, OncoLogic and COMPACT. Comparative tests of the ability of these systems to predict carcinogenicity show that improvement is still needed. The consensus approach is recommended, whereby the results from several prediction systems are pooled.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 127
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
BARRATT MD, 1995, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM, V23, P111
[2]   Development of an expert system rulebase for the prospective identification of photoallergens [J].
Barratt, MD ;
Castell, JV ;
Miranda, MA ;
Langowski, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY B-BIOLOGY, 2000, 58 (01) :54-61
[3]   Computational predictive programs (expert systems) in toxicology [J].
Benfenati, E ;
Gini, G .
TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 119 (03) :213-225
[4]   PREDICTING CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS IN RODENTS - THE STATE-OF-THE-ART IN LIGHT OF A COMPARATIVE EXERCISE [J].
BENIGNI, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH-ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS AND RELATED SUBJECTS, 1995, 334 (01) :103-113
[5]   The first US National Toxicology Program exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: Definitive results [J].
Benigni, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 1997, 387 (01) :35-45
[6]   STRUCTURE ACTIVITY STUDIES OF CHEMICAL CARCINOGENS - USE OF AN ELECTROPHILIC REACTIVITY PARAMETER IN A NEW QSAR MODEL [J].
BENIGNI, R ;
ANDREOLI, C ;
GIULIANI, A .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1989, 10 (01) :55-61
[7]  
Benigni R, 1996, MED RES REV, V16, P267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(199605)16:3<267::AID-MED3>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-X
[9]   Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mutagenic and carcinogenic aromatic amines [J].
Benigni, R ;
Giuliani, A ;
Franke, R ;
Gruska, A .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2000, 100 (10) :3697-3714
[10]   SALMONELLA MUTAGENICITY AND RODENT CARCINOGENICITY - QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY-RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BLAKE, BW ;
ENSLEIN, K ;
GOMBAR, VK ;
BORGSTEDT, HH .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1990, 241 (03) :261-271