Carotid endarterectomy in patients aged 75 and over: Early results and late outcome

被引:24
作者
Alozairi, O [1 ]
MacKenzie, RK [1 ]
Morgan, R [1 ]
Cooper, G [1 ]
Engeset, J [1 ]
Brittenden, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Dept Vasc Surg, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, Scotland
关键词
carotid disease; age; post-operative outcome; survival;
D O I
10.1053/ejvs.2002.1939
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: the mean age of patients in the European Carotid Surgery Trial with greater than 70% stenosis was 62 years. With changing demographics older patients are increasingly being referred for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Objectives: to assess the complications and survival (stroke-free and overall) of patients over the age of 75 undergoing CEA. Methods: analysis of a database, clinical records and cause of death of patients undergoing CEA in a single regional unit over a 7 year period (1/4/1993 until 1/4/2000), with follow-up to April 2002. The rates of further neurological events were obtained from the Scottish Morbidity Record 1 (SMR 1) of hospital discharges. Patients referred from outside the region were excluded. Differences between groups were assessed by the Chi-squared test, with Yates correction and log-rank tests. Results: of the 235 patients undergoing CEAs, 55 (23%) were 75 years or older. The post-operative neurological complication rate was 1.7% in the under 75's and 5.4% in the older group (p < 0.05). The 30 day mortality was 1.1 % (two patients) and 1.8% (one patient) respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival for the under 75's and older were 93 and 75% at 3 years and 80 and 59% at 5 years respectively (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimated neurological event-free 5 year survival for the under 75's and older patients were 96 and 82% respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: CEA in patients aged 75 years and over is associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke and death. CEA may not benefit elderly patients with a reduced life expectancy.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 249
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Gender and carotid endarterectomy: Does it matter? [J].
Akbari, CM ;
Pulling, MC ;
Pomposelli, FB ;
Gibbons, GW ;
Campbell, DR ;
LoGerfo, FW .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (06) :1103-1108
[2]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF ACUTE CEREBROVASCULAR-DISEASE IN THE COMMUNITY - THE OXFORDSHIRE COMMUNITY STROKE PROJECT 1981-86 .2. INCIDENCE, CASE FATALITY RATES AND OVERALL OUTCOME AT ONE YEAR OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION, PRIMARY INTRACEREBRAL AND SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE [J].
BAMFORD, J ;
SANDERCOCK, P ;
DENNIS, M ;
BURN, J ;
WARLOW, C .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1990, 53 (01) :16-22
[3]  
BAMFORD J, 1990, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V53, P6
[4]  
BRITTENDEN J, 1999, BRIT J SURG, P86
[5]   Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European carotid surgery trial (ECST) [J].
Farrell, B ;
Fraser, A ;
Sandercock, P ;
Slattery, J ;
Warlow, CP .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9113) :1379-1387
[6]   ROLE OF COMPLETION ANGIOSCOPY IN DETECTING TECHNICAL ERROR AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY [J].
GAUNT, ME ;
NAYLOR, AR ;
RATLIFF, DA ;
BELL, PRF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (01) :42-44
[7]  
GAUNT ME, 1994, SURGERY, V116, P479
[8]   COMPARISON AND METAANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS OF ENDARTERECTOMY FOR SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS [J].
GOLDSTEIN, LB ;
HASSELBLAD, V ;
MATCHAR, DB ;
MCCRORY, DC .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (11) :1965-1970
[9]   Influence of patient-related variables on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy [J].
Golledge, J ;
Cuming, R ;
Beattie, DK ;
Davies, AH ;
Greenhalgh, RM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (01) :120-126
[10]   The changing face of carotid endarterectomy [J].
Hirko, MK ;
Morasch, MD ;
Burke, K ;
Greisler, HP ;
Littooy, FN ;
Baker, WH .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 23 (04) :622-627