Ordered subset reconstruction for x-ray CT

被引:95
作者
Beekman, FJ
Kamphuis, C
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht Hosp E02 222, Image Sci Inst, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Crump Inst Mol Imaging, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/46/7/307
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Statistical methods for image reconstruction such as the maximum likelihood expectation maximization are more robust and flexible than analytical inversion methods and allow for accurate modelling of the counting statistics and photon transport during acquisition of projection data. Statistical reconstruction is prohibitively slow when applied to clinical x-ray CT due to the large data sets and the high number of iterations required for reconstructing high-resolution images. Recently, however. powerful methods for accelerating statistical reconstruction have been proposed which. instead of accessing all projections simultaneously for updating an image estimate. are based on accessing a subset of projections at the time during iterative reconstruction. In this paper we study images generated by the convex algorithm accelerated by the use of ordered subsets (the OS convex algorithm (OSC)) for data sets with sizes, noise levels and spatial resolution representative of x-ray CT imaging. It is only in the case of extremely high acceleration factors (higher than 50, corresponding to fewer than 20 projections per subset). that areas with incorrect grey values appear in the reconstructed images. and that image noise increases compared with the standard convex algorithm. These image degradations can be adequately corrected for by running the final iteration of OSC with a reduced number of subsets. Even by applying such a relatively slow final iteration, OSC produces almost an equal resolution and lesion contrast as the standard convex algorithm, but more than two orders of magnitude faster.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1844
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Beekman FJ, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P1996
[2]   A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihoods in emission tomography [J].
Browne, J ;
DePierro, AR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (05) :687-699
[3]   Block-iterative methods for image reconstruction from projections [J].
Byrne, CL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (05) :792-794
[4]  
Censor Y., 1990, MATH METHODS TOMOGRA, P133
[5]   Reduction of metal streak artifacts in x-ray computed tomography using a transmission maximum a posteriori algorithm [J].
De Man, B ;
Nuyts, J ;
Dupont, P ;
Marchal, G ;
Suetens, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2000, 47 (03) :977-981
[6]   Ordered subsets algorithms for transmission tomography [J].
Erdogan, H ;
Fessler, JA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (11) :2835-2851
[7]   Long focal length, asymmetric fan beam collimation for transmission acquisition with a triple camera SPECT system [J].
Gilland, DR ;
Wang, HL ;
Coleman, RE ;
Jaszczak, RJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1997, 44 (03) :1191-1196
[8]   Transmission CT reconstruction for offset fan beam collimation [J].
Gilland, DR ;
Jaszczak, RJ ;
Coleman, RE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2000, 47 (04) :1602-1606
[9]  
GOERTZEN A, 2000, 2000 IEEE NUCL SCI S
[10]   A PROJECTION ACCESS ORDER FOR SPEEDY CONVERGENCE OF ART (ALGEBRAIC RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE) - A MULTILEVEL SCHEME FOR COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
GUAN, HQ ;
GORDON, R .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (11) :2005-2022