Effects of surface finish on indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives

被引:29
作者
Chung, SM [1 ]
Yap, AUJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Singapore 119074, Singapore
关键词
indentation test; modulus; hardness; dental restorative materials; dental composites; mechanical properties; surface finish;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The depth-sensing micro-indentation testing was recentlyintroduced for the characterization of dental composites. One of the critical issues raised was the possible influence of surface finish on material properties. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of surface finish on the indentation modulus and micro-hardness of resin-based dental composite materials. Methods: The materials used included minifill (Z100, 3M ESPE), microfill (A110, 3M ESPE) and poly-acid modified (F2000, 3M ESPE) composites. The specimens were polished successively using SiC grinding papers of different grit size and diamond suspensions to achieve varying surface roughness. The arithmetic mean of the roughness (R-a) was measured using profilometry. In the depth-sensing micro-indentation test, specimens (n=7) were indented to 10N with Vickers indenter and the load-displacement (P-h) data was obtained using a universal testing system. The indentation modulus (E-in) and hardness (H) were then computed using the developed analytical solutions. Data was analyzed using ANOVA/post-hoc Scheffe's test at significance level 0.05. Results: The polished specimens had surface roughness ranging from 0.02 to 0.81 mu m. The roughness of F2000 was significantly higher than A110 and Z100. The E-in and H for Z100 ranged from 14.02 to 14.83 GPa and 1.18 to 1.27 GPa, respectively. Ein for F2000 and A110 ranged from 12.25 to 13.82 GPa and 5.26 to 5.52 GPa and hardness ranged from 0.89 to 0.98 GPa and 0.52 to 0.55 GPa, respectively. Significance: The indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives were independent of the surface finish provided indenter penetration is sufficiently deep (h(max)/R-a > 30). (c) 2005 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1016
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Contact mechanics [J].
Barber, JR ;
Ciavarella, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2000, 37 (1-2) :29-43
[2]   Improvements in the indentation method with a surface force apparatus [J].
Bec, S ;
Tonck, A ;
Georges, JM ;
Georges, E ;
Loubet, JL .
PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE A-PHYSICS OF CONDENSED MATTER STRUCTURE DEFECTS AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, 1996, 74 (05) :1061-1072
[3]   Deconvolution of hardness from data obtained from nanoindentation of rough surfaces [J].
Bobji, MS ;
Biswas, SK .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1999, 14 (06) :2259-2268
[4]  
Chung SM, 2004, BIOMATERIALS, V25, P2455, DOI 10.1016/j.biomatcrials.2003.09.029
[5]  
CHUNG SM, IN PRESS J BIOMED MA
[6]  
Dietschi D., 1997, ADHESIVE METAL FREE
[7]   A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments [J].
Doerner, M. F. ;
Nix, W. D. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1986, 1 (04) :601-609
[8]   RATE OF ELUTION OF LEACHABLE COMPONENTS FROM COMPOSITE [J].
FERRACANE, JL ;
CONDON, JR .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1990, 6 (04) :282-287
[10]  
Kishen A, 2000, J BIOMED MATER RES, V51, P650, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(20000915)51:4<650::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO