Efficacy and safety of telmisartan, a selective AT1 receptor antagonist, compared with enalapril in elderly patients with primary hypertension

被引:80
作者
Karlberg, BE [1 ]
Lins, LE
Hermansson, K
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Endocrinol Sect, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Boehringer Ingelheim AB, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
telmisartan; enalapril; AT(1) receptor antagonist; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; hypertension; elderly; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring;
D O I
10.1097/00004872-199917020-00015
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the novel AT(1) receptor antagonist, telmisartan, compared with that of enalapril in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Design A 26-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, dosage titration study. Methods A total of 278 patients aged greater than or equal to 65 years were randomized to either telmisartan or enalapril once a day. The telmisartan dosage was increased from 20 to 40-80 mg and that of enalapril from 5 to 10-20 mg at 4-week intervals until trough supine diastolic blood pressure was < 90 mmHg. After 12 weeks, hydrochlorothiazide at 12.5-25 mg once a day was added to the treatment regimen of those patients not controlled on monotherapy. Results Both treatments lowered blood pressure in a comparable and clinically meaningful manner. The adjusted mean changes from baseline in supine diastolic blood pressure at trough were -12.8 mmHg for telmisartan and -11.4 mmHg for enalapril (P = 0.074). Mean changes in supine systolic blood pressure were -22.1 mmHg for telmisartan and -20.1 mmHg for enalapril (P = 0.350). Overall, 63 and 62% of patients responded to telmisartan and enalapril, respectively, with a supine diastolic blood pressure of < 90 mmHg. Both regimens provided effective blood pressure lowering over the 24 h dosing interval, as determined by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Both regimens were well tolerated; however, patients on the enalapril regimen had more than double the incidence of treatment-related cough compared with those on the telmisartan regimen (16 versus 6.5%), Conclusions These results demonstrate that telmisartan is well tolerated and is at least as effective as enalapril in treating elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. (C) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 302
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Adverse effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [J].
Alderman, CP .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1996, 30 (01) :55-61
[2]   Valsartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist: A double-blind study comparing the incidence of cough with lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide [J].
Benz, J ;
Oshrain, C ;
Henry, D ;
Avery, C ;
Chiang, YT ;
Gatlin, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 37 (02) :101-107
[3]  
Bohm M, 1996, MOL CELL BIOCHEM, V164, P217
[4]  
BOHM M, 1995, J HYPERTENS, V13, P891
[5]   Angiotensin II receptor antagonists - Potential in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease [J].
Burrell, LM ;
Johnston, CI .
DRUGS & AGING, 1997, 10 (06) :421-434
[6]   Double-blind comparison of losartan, lisinopril, and metolazone in elderly hypertensive patients with previous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough [J].
Chan, P ;
Tomlinson, B ;
Huang, TY ;
Ko, JT ;
Lin, TS ;
Lee, YS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 37 (03) :253-257
[7]   CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ENALAPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN 200 HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS [J].
DAHLOF, B ;
HANSSON, L ;
ACOSTA, JH ;
BOLZANO, K ;
FAIRHURST, G ;
FERREIRA, C ;
KAARSALO, E ;
SILVA, MC ;
SIMONE, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1988, 1 (01) :38-41
[8]  
FYHRQUIST F, 1976, CLIN CHEM, V22, P250
[9]  
Hämmerlein A, 1998, CLIN PHARMACOKINET, V35, P49
[10]   Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: Efficacy and safety compared with placebo and enalapril [J].
Holwerda, NJ ;
Fogari, R ;
Angeli, P ;
Porcellati, C ;
Hereng, C ;
OddouStock, P ;
Heath, R ;
Bodin, F .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1996, 14 (09) :1147-1151