Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden

被引:110
作者
Dahlen, Lisa [1 ]
Vukicevic, Sanita
Meijer, Jan-Erik
Lagerkvist, Anders
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Div Waste Sci & Technol, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Nordvastra Skanes Rehallnings AB, SE-25189 Helsingborg, Sweden
关键词
13;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2006.06.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Composition and quantity per person of municipal solid waste (MSW) have been analyzed in six municipalities in southern Sweden with similar socio-economic conditions but with different collection systems. Samples of residual waste have been sorted, classified and weighed in 21 categories during 26 analyses that took place from 1998-2004. Collection data of the total waste flow, including source sorted recycling materials, in the same area have been compiled and compared. Multivariate data analyses have been applied. Weight-based billing reduced delivered amounts of residual household waste by 50%, but it is unknown to what extent improper material paths had developed. With curbside collection more metal, plastic and paper packaging was separated and left to recycling. When separate collection of biodegradables was included in the curbside system, the overall sorting of dry recyclables increased. The large uncertainty associated with waste composition analyses makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions regarding the effects on specific recyclables or the changes in the composition of the residual waste. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1305
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Berg P.E., 1993, THESIS I VATTENFORSO
[2]  
ERIKSSON L, 2001, 919737301X UM AC UME, P533
[3]  
*EUR COMM, 2004, METH AN SOL WAST SWA
[4]  
FUKICEVIC S, 2001, 155 FOU
[5]  
MATTSSON C, 2003, WASTE MANAGEMENT PRO
[6]  
NORDT, 1995, SOL WAST MUN SAMPL C
[7]  
Ohlsson T., 1998, THESIS LULEA U TECHN
[8]  
OHLSSON T, 1999, PLOCKANALYS HUSHALLS
[9]  
PLOECHL C, 2003, STANDARDIZATION SOLI, P32
[10]  
SFS, 1994, 19941205 SFS