International staging system for multiple myeloma

被引:2121
作者
Greipp, PR
San Miguel, J
Durie, BGM
Crowley, JJ
Barlogie, B
Bladé, J
Boccadoro, M
Child, JA
Harousseau, JL
Kyle, RA
Lahuerta, JJ
Ludwig, H
Morgan, G
Powles, R
Shimizu, K
Shustik, C
Sonneveld, P
Tosi, P
Turesson, I
Westin, J
机构
[1] Int Myeloma Fdn, Int Headquarters, SW Oncol Grp, N Hollywood, CA 91607 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Eastern Cooperat Oncol Grp, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Univ Salamanca, Grp Espanol Mieloma, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
[5] Univ Salamanca, Program Estudio & Tratamiento Hemapatias Malignas, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
[6] Hosp Clin Barcelona, PETHEMA, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Hosp, Grp Espanol Mieloma, Madrid, Spain
[8] Cedars Sinai Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[9] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[10] Canc Res & Biostat, Seattle, WA USA
[11] Univ Turin, Italian Cooperat Grp, Turin, Italy
[12] Univ Bologna, Policlin S Orsola, Ist Ematol L & A Seragnoli, Italian Cooperat Grp, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[13] Gen Infirm, MRC, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[14] Royal Marsden Hosp, MRC, Sutton, Surrey, England
[15] Parkside Oncol Clin, Myeloma Unit, Wimbledon, England
[16] Intergrp Francais Myelome, Inst Biol, Nantes, France
[17] Wilhelminenspital Stat Wien, Vienna, Austria
[18] Nagoya City Higashi Gen Hosp, Japan Myeloma Study Gep, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[19] Natl Canc Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[20] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[21] Erasmus MC Hosp, Dutch Belgian Haematol Oncol Cooperat Grp Data Ct, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[22] Nord Myeloma Study Grp, Malmo, Sweden
[23] Univ Lund Hosp, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose There is a need for a simple, reliable staging system for multiple myeloma that can be applied internationally for patient classification and stratification. Patients and Methods Clinical and laboratory data were gathered on 10,750 previously untreated symptomatic myeloma patients from 17 institutions, including sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate techniques. Three modeling approaches were then explored to develop a staging system including two nontree and one tree survival assessment methodologies. Results Serum beta(2)-microglobulin (S beta M-2), serum albumin, platelet count, serum creatinine, and age emerged as powerful predictors of survival and were then used in the tree analysis approach. A combination of S beta M-2 and serum albumin provided the simplest, most powerful and reproducible three-stage classification. This new International Staging System (ISS) was validated in the remaining patients and consists of the following stages: stage I, S beta M-2 less than 3.5 mg/L plus serum albumin >= 3.5 g/dL (median survival, 62 months); stage II, neither stage I nor III (median survival, 44 months); and stage III, S beta M-2 >= 5.5 mg/L (median survival, 29 months). The ISS system was further validated by demonstrating effectiveness in patients in North America, Europe, and Asia; in patients less than and >= 65 years of age; in patients with standard therapy or autotransplantation; and in comparison with the Durie/Salmon staging system. Conclusion The new ISS is simple, based on easy to use variables (S beta M-2 and serum albumin), and recommended for early adoption and widespread use. (c) 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3412 / 3420
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条