Empirical analysis of budget and allocation of trade promotions in the US supermarket industry

被引:31
作者
Gomez, Miguel I. [1 ]
Rao, Vithala R.
Mclaughlin, Edward W.
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Johnson Grad Sch Management, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Appl Econ & Management, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.44.3.410
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using a unique data set, the authors examine the role of manufacturer and retailer characteristics in the joint determination of trade promotion budgets for supermarket brands and their allocation across trade promotion types. They find that manufacturer variables, such as brand position in retailer product category and brand price premium, and annual retailer sales determine trade promotion budgets. Furthermore, retail companies with larger shares of private labels in product category sales, larger annual sales, and stronger brand positioning are able to increase the allocation of promotional funds to off-invoices and decrease allocation to performance-based trade promotions, such as scanbacks/ accruals and billbacks. Manufacturers with formal trade promotion policies tend to decrease allocation to off-invoices. The authors discuss marketing policy implications of this study and provide research directions.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 424
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[2]  
Ailawadi K, 1999, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V41, P83
[3]   Understanding retail branding: conceptual insights and research priorities [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Keller, KL .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2004, 80 (04) :331-342
[4]   An empirical analysis of the determinants of retail margins: The role of store-brand share [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Harlam, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2004, 68 (01) :147-165
[5]  
[Anonymous], MARK LETT
[6]  
[Anonymous], PROMO MAGAZINE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SUPERMARKET NEWS
[8]  
Bell DR, 2002, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V43, P42
[9]  
Besanko David, 2005, MARKET SCI, V24, P110
[10]  
BRENNAN WJ, 1990, WASH U LQ, V68, P1