MNCs and International Accountability Standards Through an Institutional Lens: Evidence of Symbolic Conformity or Decoupling

被引:107
作者
Jamali, Dima [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Suliman S Olayan Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Corporate Social Responsibility; International Accountability Standards; Multinational Corporations; Institutional Theory; CORPORATE-SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; MANAGEMENT STANDARDS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF-REGULATION; PRESSURES; DIFFUSION; FRAMEWORK; CARE; CSR;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-010-0443-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The recent proliferation of International Accountability Standards (IAS) has attracted significant academic interest, but the extent of their adoption and integration by global firms remains underinvestigated. Capitalizing on institutional theory and the typology of strategic responses to institutional pressures proposed by Oliver (Acad Manage Rev 16(1):145-179, 1991), this article uses an interpretive research methodology to analyze a sample of MNC practitioners' views regarding IAS, and derive some insights in relation to expected patterns of strategic responses to these new institutional pressures. The article also presents relevant remarks relating to the usefulness of institutional theory in the context of research relating to IAS. The findings suggest patterns of engagement combining elements of both conformity and resistance, although the answers correspond most closely to a decoupling or symbolic conformity strategic response. The findings are fleshed out and their implications delineated/assessed.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 640
页数:24
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing [J].
Ang, S ;
Cummings, LL .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (03) :235-256
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Institutional patterns and culture
[3]   Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world [J].
Blowfield, M ;
Frynas, JG .
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2005, 81 (03) :499-513
[4]  
Christensen T., 2003, Public Organization Review, V3, P3, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1023002810428
[5]  
DARNALL N, 2003, AC MAN BEST C 2003
[6]   Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms [J].
Davis, GF ;
Marquis, C .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (04) :332-343
[7]   The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective [J].
Delmas, MA .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2002, 35 (01) :91-119
[8]   The diffusion of voluntary international management standards: Responsible Care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the chemical industry [J].
Delmas, Magali ;
Montiel, Ivan .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2008, 36 (01) :65-93
[9]  
DENSCOMBE M., 2003, GOOD RES GUIDE SMALL, V2nd
[10]   The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983) [J].
DiMaggio, PJ ;
Powell, WW .
ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 :143-166