Social exclusion and transgenic technology: The case of brazilian agriculture

被引:29
作者
Hall, Jeremy
Matos, Stelvia
Langford, Cooper H.
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Haskayne Sch Business, Int Inst Resource Ind & Sustainabil Studies, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Commun & Culture, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
Brazilian agriculture; social exclusion; technology management; transgenics;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-006-9293-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many argue that transgenic technology will have wide-ranging implications for farmers in developing nations. A key concern is that competencies may be destroyed by predominantly foreign multinational transgenic technologies, exacerbating problems of social exclusion in the case of subsistence farmers. Conversely, those that fail to adopt the technology may become uncompetitive, particularly in commodity-based export markets. Drawing on interview data conducted in Brazil and supporting data collected in North America, Europe and China, we found that the impact of transgenic technology varies. It has less impact on farmers that adapt the products to their crop systems and environment, and greater negative implications for less formally educated subsistence farmers in consequence of both complexity and compatibility. Earlier attempts at industrializing agriculture through technological innovation led to vastly improved agricultural output and exports, but the benefits of productivity was not equitably distributed [D. Lee: 2005, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(5), 1325-1334], nor was it designed to meet specific local environmental and socioeconomic farmer conditions, exacerbating social exclusion. Multinationals attempting to introduce transgenic technology without considering the broader social and ethical implications will invite resistance. We discuss the implications for policy makers, multinationals and small-scale farmers.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 63
页数:19
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Stakeholder attitudes toward the risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: A comparison between Mexico and the Philippines [J].
Aerni, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (06) :1123-1137
[2]  
Afuah A., 1998, INNOVATION MANAGEMEN
[3]   FOOLS RUSH IN - THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY CREATION [J].
ALDRICH, HE ;
FIOL, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) :645-670
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1776, WEALTH NATIONS
[5]  
[Anonymous], ETHICS MANAGEMENT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, STRATEGIC ENTREPRENE
[7]   Combating social exclusion in Europe: The new urban policy challenge [J].
Atkinson, R .
URBAN STUDIES, 2000, 37 (5-6) :1037-1055
[8]   ENTREPRENEURSHIP - PRODUCTIVE, UNPRODUCTIVE, AND DESTRUCTIVE [J].
BAUMOL, WJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (05) :893-921
[9]  
Behrman J.R., 2003, WHOS WHOS OUT SOCIAL
[10]  
Berg S., 1988, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, V8, P528, DOI DOI 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176467