No threshold dose for estradiol-induced sex reversal of turtle embryos: How little is too much?

被引:109
作者
Sheehan, DM
Willingham, E
Gaylor, D
Bergeron, JM
Crews, D
机构
[1] US FDA, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Genet & Dev Toxicol, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Dept Zool, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
biologically based dose-response model; development; endocrine disruptors; estrogens; risk assessment; safety testing; sex determination; sex reversal; threshold; turtle;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.99107155
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Risk assessments for nongenotoxic chemicals assume a threshold below which no adverse outcomes are seen. However, when an endogenous chemical, such as 17 beta-estradiol (E-2), occurs at a concentration sufficient to cause an effect, the threshold is already exceeded. Under these circumstances, exogenous estradiol is not expected to provide a threshold dose. This principle is demonstrated for E-2 in the red-eared slider, a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination. In this species, gonadal sex is determined by egg incubation temperature; female development requires endogenous estrogen produced by elevated temperature. While normal production of females by endogenous estrogens is not an adverse effect, exogenous estrogens can sex reverse presumptive males, which can be an adverse effect. A large dose-response study was conducted using seven doses and a vehicle control (starting n = 300/group); a single E-2 dose was applied to the eggshell of recently laid eggs. Animals were sexed after hatching. The incubation temperature chosen, 28.6 degrees C, generates a minority of females. Thus, the criteria for testing the threshold hypothesis were met, i.e., there is evidence that there is endogenous estrogen and that it generates an irreversible response. The lowest E-2 dose tested, 400 pg/egg (40 ng/kg), sex reversed 14.4% of the animals, demonstrating very low dose sensitivity. The data were fit with a modified Michaelis-Menten equation, which provided an estimate of 1.7 ng/egg for endogenous estradiol, The median effective dose (ED50) was 5.0 +/- 2.0 ng/egg (35% confidence limits), of which 1.7 ng/egg was endogenous estradiol and 3.3 ng/egg came from the applied estradiol. There was no apparent threshold dose for E-2. A smaller replication confirmed these results. These results provide a simple biologically based dose-response model and suggest that chemicals which act mechanistically like E-2 may also show no threshold dose. If so, even low environmental concentrations of such chemicals may carry risk for sex reversal.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 159
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ISSUES REV TERATOLOG
[2]  
APANIUS V, COMMUNICATION
[3]   PCBS AS ENVIRONMENTAL ESTROGENS - TURTLE SEX DETERMINATION AS A BIOMARKER OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION [J].
BERGERON, JM ;
CREWS, D ;
MCLACHLAN, JA .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 102 (09) :780-781
[4]   ESTROGENIC ACTIVITY OF COUMESTROL AND RELATED COMPOUNDS [J].
BICKOFF, EM ;
LIVINGSTON, AL ;
BOOTH, AN .
ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 1960, 88 (02) :262-266
[5]  
BITMAN J, 1968, Science (Washington D C), V162, P371, DOI 10.1126/science.162.3851.371
[6]   OVARIAN AND ADRENAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO POSTNATAL-GROWTH AND DIFFERENTIATION OF THE RAT UTERUS [J].
BRANHAM, WS ;
SHEEHAN, DM .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1995, 53 (04) :863-872
[7]   TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT SEX DETERMINATION IN REPTILES - PROXIMATE MECHANISMS, ULTIMATE OUTCOMES, AND PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS [J].
CREWS, D ;
BERGERON, JM ;
BULL, JJ ;
FLORES, D ;
TOUSIGNANT, A ;
SKIPPER, JK ;
WIBBELS, T .
DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS, 1994, 15 (03) :297-312
[8]   Temperature-dependent sex determination: The interplay of steroid hormones and temperature [J].
Crews, D .
ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 13 (01) :1-13
[9]   ESTROGEN AND SEX REVERSAL IN TURTLES - A DOSE-DEPENDENT PHENOMENON [J].
CREWS, D ;
BULL, JJ ;
WIBBELS, T .
GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1991, 81 (03) :357-364
[10]   Environmental exposures that affect the endocrine system: Public health implications [J].
DeRosa, C ;
Richter, P ;
Pohl, H ;
Jones, DE .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 1998, 1 (01) :3-26