Quality assessment for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in relation to ERSPC: report of the PSA Committee

被引:7
作者
Blijenberg, BG [1 ]
Lilja, H
Neels, H
Stenman, UH
机构
[1] Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Clin Chem, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Clin Chem, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Gen Ctr Hosp, Lab Clin Biochem, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Univ Cent Hosp, Dept Clin Chem, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1465-5101.2003.04401.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the application of a quality control scheme for total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as used for participants of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) during 1996-2002. Methods From 1996, the first complete year being 1997, an external scheme was organized by the Dutch Quality Assessment Foundation especially for the ERSPC. This scheme consists of one control round every 2 months with two different human serum samples and is only meant to compare the recovery of methods. From 1998 an internal scheme was also applied by adding two distinct samples to every round. Results Initially there was a wide variation (coefficient of variation of +/-15% at threshold PSA of 4.0 ng/mL) among all ERSPC participants who were all using the Tandem assay (Hybritech Inc, USA). After introducing the internal scheme the performance of some intra-ERSPC group comparisons for PSA and the introduction of the completely automated Beckman-Access analyser in 2001 there was state-of-the-art precision for PSA of 5% in the 2002 surveys. Conclusion The ERSPC group measurements of PSA have considerably improved since 1996 because of the application of a quality-assessment scheme and with the introduction of complete automation of the PSA assay. Both findings are in line with earlier developments in clinical chemistry.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 70
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The role of molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA or hK3) and of human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) in the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer and in extra-prostatic disease [J].
Becker, C ;
Noldus, J ;
Diamandis, E ;
Lilja, H .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES, 2001, 38 (05) :357-399
[2]   One hundred years of cancer immunotherapy: A critical appraisal [J].
Ben-Efraim, S .
TUMOR BIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (01) :1-24
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Discordant performance of assays for free and total prostate-specific antigen in relation to the early detection of prostate cancer [J].
Blijenberg, BG ;
Yurdakul, G ;
Van Zelst, B ;
Bangma, CH ;
Wildhagen, MF ;
Schröder, FH .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (06) :545-550
[5]  
DENIS LJ, 1995, CANCER, V75, P1187, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950301)75:5<1187::AID-CNCR2820750521>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-G
[7]   Physiologic (intraindividual) variation of serum prostate-specific antigen in 814 men from a screening population [J].
Komatsu, K ;
Wehner, N ;
Prestigiacomo, AF ;
Chen, ZX ;
Stamey, TA .
UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (03) :343-346
[8]  
Laffin RJ, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P129
[9]  
LILJA H, 1991, CLIN CHEM, V37, P1618
[10]   Free prostate-specific antigen in serum is becoming more complex [J].
Mikolajczyk, SD ;
Marks, LS ;
Partin, AW ;
Rittenhouse, HG .
UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (06) :797-802