A survey of perceptions and attitudes among European surgeons towards the clinical impact and management of postoperative ileus

被引:51
作者
Kehlet, H
Williamson, R
Büchler, MW
Beart, RW
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Sect Surg Pathophysiol, DK-92100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] GlaxoSmithKline R&D, GI Clin Dev, Greenford, Middx, England
[3] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Surg, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ So Calif, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
colorectal surgery; postoperative complications; ileus; pre-operative care; gastrointestinal motility; intestinal obstruction;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00763.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Postoperative ileus (POI) can negatively affect patient recovery and morbidity, yet the lack of an internationally accepted definition and clinical management pathway for this condition suggest POI may be under-recognized as a clinical problem. The purpose of this survey was therefore to assess current attitudes of surgeons towards the clinical impact and management of POI. Subjects and methods: Telephone interviews were conducted with 230 surgeons from hospitals in the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Results: Across Europe, there are differences in the terms surgeons use to refer to delayed recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function and the symptoms, concerns and risks they associate with this condition. Furthermore, there is marked variation in the attitudes of European surgeons towards minimizing the risk of delayed recovery of GI function and in the strategies to manage POI. Additionally, some of the measures applied most commonly by European surgeons are in contrast to evidence in the literature indicating that they have no benefit for quicker resolution of GI function. Conclusion: The results suggest that there is a need for clearer definition of the factors that constitute POI, increased recognition of the impact of this condition and improved understanding of the most effective peri-/ postoperative care for Surgical patients.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BUCHLER MW, 2004, COLORECTAL DIS S2, V6, P13
[2]   Prokinetic agents for the treatment of postoperative ileus in adults: A review of the literature [J].
Bungard, TJ ;
Kale-Pradhan, PB .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1999, 19 (04) :416-423
[3]   A METAANALYSIS OF SELECTIVE VERSUS ROUTINE NASOGASTRIC DECOMPRESSION AFTER ELECTIVE LAPAROTOMY [J].
CHEATHAM, ML ;
CHAPMAN, WC ;
KEY, SP ;
SAWYERS, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (05) :469-478
[4]   Postoperative ileus: a preventable event [J].
Holte, K ;
Kehlet, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (11) :1480-1493
[5]   Review of postoperative ileus [J].
Kehlet, H ;
Holte, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 182 (5A) :3S-10S
[6]  
LACY AM, 1995, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V9, P1101
[7]   Early enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials [J].
Lewis, SJ ;
Egger, M ;
Sylvester, PA ;
Thomas, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7316) :773-776
[8]   PROKINETIC AGENTS FOR LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY DISORDERS [J].
LONGO, WE ;
VERNAVA, AM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1993, 36 (07) :696-708
[9]   Mechanisms and treatment of postoperative ileus [J].
Luckey, A ;
Livingston, E ;
Taché, Y .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 138 (02) :206-214
[10]  
Resnick J, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P751