Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

被引:59
作者
Seglen, PO
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 502
页数:5
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Andersen H, 1996, DANSK SOCIOLOGI, V2, P72
[2]  
ANDERSEN H, 1996, BIBLIOTEKSARBEJDE, V17, P19
[3]   Science indicators derived from databases - The case of the social sciences [J].
Artus, HM .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1996, 37 (02) :297-311
[4]  
BAUIN S, 1992, REPRESENTATIONS SCI, P225
[5]   Standards issues in a national bibliometric database: The Australian case [J].
Bourke, P ;
Butler, L .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1996, 35 (02) :199-207
[6]   THE SCIENTOMETRIC WEIGHT OF 50 NATIONS IN 27 SCIENCE AREAS, 1989-1993 .2. LIFE SCIENCES [J].
BRAUN, T ;
GLANZEL, W ;
GRUPP, H .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1995, 34 (02) :207-237
[7]  
Brenner, 1995, NATURE, V375, P624
[8]   ITALIAN PROFESSORSHIPS [J].
CALZA, L ;
GARBISA, S .
NATURE, 1995, 374 (6522) :492-492
[9]   CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW [J].
COLE, S ;
COLE, JR ;
SIMON, GA .
SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4523) :881-886
[10]  
Drettner B, 1994, Lakartidningen, V91, P744