Comparison of the efficacy of atorvastatin versus cerivastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia

被引:11
作者
Hunninghake, D
Insull, W
Knopp, R
Davidson, M
Lohrbauer, L
Jones, P
Kafonek, S
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Pharmacol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Chicago Ctr Clin Res, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Jacksonville Ctr Clin Res, Jacksonville, FL USA
[7] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01805-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This 6-week Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Blinded End point (PROBE) study conducted at 12 sites in the United States compared the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin with cerivastatin. In all, 215 hypercholesterolemic patients (low-density lipoprotein [LDL) cholesterol greater than or equal to 160 mg/dl [4.14 mmol/L]; triglycerides less than or equal to 400 mg/dl [4.52 mmol/L]) were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg once daily (n = 108) or cerivastatin 0.3 mg once daily (n = 107). Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes from baseline in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides. Atorvastatin produced significantly greater (p <0.0001) reductions from baseline to week 6 in LDL cholesterol (37.7% vs 30.2%), total cholesterol (27.5% vs 22.2%), and apolipoprotein B (28.6% vs 21.2%), and a significantly greater (p <0.05) increase from baseline to week 6 in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (6.8% vs 4.3%) than cerivastatin. Atorvastatin treatment was also associated with a greater percent decrease from baseline to week 6 in triglycerides, with a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.0982). The percentage of patients that achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program LDL cholesterol goal was greater for those receiving atorvastatin (73%) than for those receiving cerivastatin (66%). The proportion of patients experiencing drug-attributable adverse events, which were mostly mild to moderate and related to the digestive system, was significantly less (p <0.05) with atorvastatin (5%) than with cerivastatin (14%) treatment. In conclusion, atorvastatin (10 mg/day) is more effective at lowering LDL cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients than cerivastatin (0.3 mg/day). Both atorvastatin and cerivastatin are well tolerated, with safety profiles similar to other members of the statin class. (C) 2001 by Excerpts Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 639
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia [J].
Bertolini, S ;
Bon, GB ;
Campbell, LM ;
Farnier, M ;
Langan, J ;
Mahla, G ;
Pauciullo, P ;
Sirtori, C ;
Egros, F ;
Fayyad, R ;
Nawrocki, JW .
ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 1997, 130 (1-2) :191-197
[2]  
BRESHOW NE, 1980, STAT METHODS CANC RE, V1
[3]  
Campeau L, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P153
[4]   A multicenter, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of Atorvastatin versus Simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia [J].
Dart, A ;
Jerums, G ;
Nicholson, G ;
dEmden, M ;
HamiltonCraig, I ;
Tallis, G ;
Best, J ;
West, M ;
Sullivan, D ;
Bracs, P ;
Black, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 80 (01) :39-44
[5]   Comparison of one-year efficacy and safety of Atorvastatin versus Lovastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia [J].
Davidson, M ;
McKenney, J ;
Stein, E ;
Schrott, H ;
BakkerArkema, R ;
Fayyad, R ;
Black, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (11) :1475-1481
[6]  
FRIEDEWALD WT, 1972, CLIN CHEM, V18, P499
[7]  
GRUNDY SM, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V269, P3015, DOI 10.1001/jama.269.23.3015
[8]  
Hansson L, 1992, Blood Press, V1, P113, DOI 10.3109/08037059209077502
[9]   Comparative dose efficacy study of Atorvastatin versus Simvastatin, Pravastatin, Lovastatin, and Fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (The CURVES study) [J].
Jones, P ;
Kafonek, S ;
Laurora, I ;
Hunninghake, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (05) :582-587
[10]  
Medical Economics, 1999, PHYS DESK REF, V53rd