The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment

被引:336
作者
Rodríguez, DA
Joo, J
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Environm Design & Planning, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
travel mode choice; local accessibility; built environment; non-motorized modes;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2003.11.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
By estimating multinomial choice models, this paper examines the relationship between travel mode choice and attributes of the local physical environment such as topography, sidewalk availability, residential density.. and the presence of walking and cycling paths. Data for student and staff commuters to the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill are used to illustrate the relationship between mode choice and the objectively measured environmental attributes, while accounting for typical modal characteristics such as travel time, access time, and out-of-pocket cost. Results suggest that jointly the four attributes of the local physical environment make significant marginal contributions to explaining travel mode choice. In particular, the estimates reveal that local topography and sidewalk availability are significantly associated with the attractiveness of non-motorized modes. Point elasticities are provided and recommendations given regarding the importance of incorporating non-motorized modes into local transportation planning and in the study of how the built environment influences travel behavior. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 173
页数:23
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Transportation Research Record
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Transportation Research Record
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HIGHW CAP MAN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, BICYCLE TRANSPORTATI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, TRANSPORT RES REC
[6]   Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling [J].
Badoe, DA ;
Miller, EJ .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 5 (04) :235-263
[7]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[8]  
BENAKIVA M, 1998, 8 INT C TRAV BEH AUS
[9]   A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice [J].
Bhat, CR .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1995, 29 (06) :471-483
[10]  
Boarnet MarlonGary., 2001, Travel by Design the Influence of Urban Form on Travel