Homophily and Contagion as Explanations for Weight Similarities Among Adolescent Friends

被引:99
作者
de la Haye, Kayla [1 ,2 ]
Robins, Garry [3 ]
Mohr, Philip [4 ]
Wilson, Carlene [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] CSIRO Preventat Hlth Flagship, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] CSIRO Food & Nutr Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Gastroenterol, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[6] Canc Council S Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Obesity; Adolescent; Peer effects; Social networks; Stochastic actor-oriented models; Selection; BODY-MASS INDEX; SOCIAL NETWORKS; US CHILDREN; OBESITY; OVERWEIGHT; HEALTH; PREVALENCE; SELECTION; BEHAVIOR; GENDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.008
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether weight-based similarities among adolescent friends result from social influence processes, after controlling for the role of weight on friendship selection and other confounding influences. Methods: Four waves of data were collected from a grade 8 cohort of adolescents (N = 156, mean age = 13.6 years) over their initial 2 years of high school. At each wave, participants reported on their friendship relations with grade-mates and had their height and weight measured by researchers to calculate their body mass index (BMI). Newly developed stochastic actor-oriented models for social networks were used to simultaneously assess the role of weight on adolescents' friendship choices, and the effect of friends' BMIs on changes in adolescent BMI. Results: Adolescents' BMIs were not significantly predicted by the BMI of their friends over the 16 months of this study. Similarities in the weights of friends were found to be driven predominantly by friendship selection, whereby adolescents, particularly those who were not overweight, preferred to initiate friendships with peers whose weight status (overweight/nonoverweight) was the same as their own. Conclusions: Weight-based similarities among friends were largely explained by the marginalization of overweight adolescents by their peers, rather than by the "contagion" of excess weight among friends. These findings highlight the importance of adequately modeling friendship selection processes when estimating social influence effects on adiposity. (C) 2011 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 427
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Peer victimization as a predictor of depression and body mass index in obese and non-obese adolescents
    Adams, Ryan E.
    Bukowski, William M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 49 (08) : 858 - 866
  • [2] Social dynamics of obesity
    Burke, Mary A.
    Heiland, Frank
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2007, 45 (03) : 571 - 591
  • [3] The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years
    Christakis, Nicholas A.
    Fowler, James H.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (04) : 370 - 379
  • [4] Is obesity contagious? Social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic
    Cohen-Cole, Ethan
    Fletcher, Jason M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 27 (05) : 1382 - 1387
  • [5] Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey
    Cole, TJ
    Bellizzi, MC
    Flegal, KM
    Dietz, WH
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7244): : 1240 - 1243
  • [6] Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation University of South Australia, 2008, 2007 AUSTR NAT CHILD
  • [7] COUZIN J, 2009, SCIENCE, V323
  • [8] Crosnoe R, 2008, SOC FORCES, V86, P1189
  • [9] Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks
    de la Haye, Kayla
    Robins, Garry
    Mohr, Philip
    Wilson, Carlene
    [J]. SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2010, 32 (03) : 161 - 167
  • [10] Basking in Reflected Glory and Its Limits: Why Adolescents Hang Out With Popular Peers
    Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis
    Cillessen, Antonius H. N.
    Lindenberg, Siegwart
    Veenstra, Rene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE, 2010, 20 (04) : 942 - 958