American College of Radiology imaging network digital mammographic Imaging screening trial: Objectives and methodology

被引:90
作者
Pisano, ED [1 ]
Gatsonis, CA
Yaffe, MJ
Hendrick, RE
Tosteson, ANA
Fryback, DG
Bassett, LW
Baum, JK
Conant, EF
Jong, RA
Rebner, M
D'Orsi, CJ
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Ctr Stat Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[6] Northwestern Univ, Dept Radiol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[7] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Med, Hanover, NH USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Madison, WI USA
[9] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[10] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[11] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[12] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiol, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[13] Emory Univ, Dept Radiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2362050440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) and each participating site and by the IRB and the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute. The study was monitored by an independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board, which received interim analyses of data to ensure that the study would be terminated early if indicated by trends in the outcomes. The ACRIN, which is funded by the National Cancer Institute, conducted the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) primarily to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital and screen-film mammography in asymptomatic women presenting for screening for breast cancer. Over the 25.5 months of enrollment, a total of 49 528 women were included at the 33 participating sites, which used five different types of digital mammography equipment. All participants underwent both screen-film and digital mammography. The digital and screen-film mammograms of each subject were independently interpreted by two radiologists. If findings of either examination were interpreted as abnormal, subsequent work-up occurred according to the recommendations of the interpreting radiologist. Breast cancer status was determined at biopsy or follow-up mammography 11-15 months after study entry. In addition to the measurement of diagnostic accuracy by using the interpretations of mammograms at the study sites, DMIST included evaluations of the relative cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life effects of digital versus screen-film mammography. Six separate reader studies using the de-identified archived DMIST mammograms will also assess the diagnostic accuracy of each of the individual digital mammography machines versus screen-film mammography machines, the effect of breast density on diagnostic accuracy of digital and screen-film mammography, and the effect of different rates of breast cancer on the diagnostic accuracy in a reader study. (c) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 412
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[3]  
Botsco M, 1999, MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY
[4]   Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer SenoScan digital mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population [J].
Cole, E ;
Pisano, ED ;
Brown, M ;
Kuzmiak, C ;
Braeuning, MP ;
Kim, HH ;
Jong, R ;
Walsh, R .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) :879-886
[5]   MULTIREADER, MULTICASE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC METHODOLOGY - A BOOTSTRAP ANALYSIS [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
BERBAUM, KS ;
LENTH, RV .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (07) :626-633
[6]   Digital mammography [J].
Feig, SA ;
Yaffe, MJ .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (04) :893-901
[7]   On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer [J].
Freedman, DA ;
Petitti, DB ;
Robins, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (01) :43-55
[8]  
FRYBACK DG, IN PRESS J NATL CANC
[9]   Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? [J].
Gotzsche, PC ;
Olsen, O .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9198) :129-134
[10]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843