What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other

被引:95
作者
Albrecht, Konstanze [2 ,3 ]
Volz, Kirsten G. [4 ]
Sutter, Matthias [5 ,6 ]
Laibson, David I. [1 ]
von Cramon, D. Yves [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Dept Econ, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[4] Max Planck Inst Neurol Res, Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Publ Finance, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Econ, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
present-biased preferences; intertemporal discounting; fMRI; multiple systems hypothesis; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; DECISION-MAKING; RISK-TAKING; EMOTION; REWARD; AMYGDALA; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsq046
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
People have present-biased preferences: they choose more impatiently when choosing between an immediate reward and a delayed reward, than when choosing between a delayed reward and a more delayed reward. Following McClure et al. [McClure, S.M., Laibson, D.I., Loewenstein, G., Cohen, J.D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503.], we find that areas in the dopaminergic reward system show greater activation when a binary choice set includes both an immediate reward and a delayed reward in contrast to activation measured when the binary choice set contains only delayed rewards. The presence of an immediate reward in the choice set elevates activation of the ventral striatum, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and anterior medial prefrontal cortex. These dopaminergic reward areas are also responsive to the identity of the recipient of the reward. Even an immediate reward does not activate these dopaminergic regions when the decision is being made for another person. Our results support the hypotheses that participants show less affective engagement (i) when they are making choices for themselves that only involve options in the future or (ii) when they are making choices for someone else. As hypothesized, we also find that behavioral choices reflect more patience when choosing for someone else.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 225
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Characterizing spatial and temporal features of autobiographical memory retrieval networks: a partial least squares approach [J].
Addis, DR ;
McIntosh, AR ;
Moscovitch, M ;
Crawley, AP ;
McAndrews, MP .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 23 (04) :1460-1471
[2]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[3]   Risk taking in relationships: Differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend [J].
Beisswanger, AH ;
Stone, ER ;
Hupp, JM ;
Allgaier, L .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 25 (02) :121-135
[4]   DECISION-MAKING AS A FUNCTION OF SELF AND OTHERS [J].
BORRESEN, CR .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1987, 64 (03) :1301-1302
[5]   Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses [J].
Breiter, HC ;
Aharon, I ;
Kahneman, D ;
Dale, A ;
Shizgal, P .
NEURON, 2001, 30 (02) :619-639
[6]   Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Bush, G ;
Luu, P ;
Posner, MI .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (06) :215-222
[7]   In search of the self: A positron emission tomography study [J].
Craik, FIM ;
Moroz, TM ;
Moscovitch, M ;
Stuss, DT ;
Winocur, G ;
Tulving, E ;
Kapur, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :26-34
[8]   CONTRIBUTIONS OF ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX TO BEHAVIOUR [J].
DEVINSKY, O ;
MORRELL, MJ ;
VOGT, BA .
BRAIN, 1995, 118 :279-306
[9]   Reciprocal suppression of regional cerebral blood flow during emotional versus higher cognitive processes: Implications for interactions between emotion and cognition [J].
Drevets, WC ;
Raichle, ME .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1998, 12 (03) :353-385
[10]   Saving for the future self: Neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting [J].
Ersner-Hershfield, Hal ;
Wimmer, G. Elliott ;
Knutson, Brian .
SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 4 (01) :85-92