Quality of life following treatment for early prostate cancer: Does low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy offer a better outcome? A review

被引:37
作者
Henderson, A [1 ]
Laing, RW [1 ]
Langley, SEM [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, St Lukes Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Guildford GU2 5XX, Surrey, England
关键词
early prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; brachytherapy; external beam radiotherapy; quality of life; symptoms;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Due to a lack of evidence from randomised studies, there is little agreement on the best form of treatment among men who require curative treatment for prostate cancer. The relative impact of the various treatments on symptoms and health-related quality of life is also controversial. We review the literature on quality of life changes following low dose rate brachytherapy (BXT) and compare BXT to other treatments for early prostate cancer. Methods: Systematic literature review 1988-2003 (Medline). Keywords: Brachytherapy; Radical prostatectomy; External beam radiotherapy; Quality of life; Symptoms. Results: Review of the current literature suggests that radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and BXT either alone or in combination with supplementary external beam radiotherapy offer good long-term health-related quality of life. However differences exist in the toxicity of treatment in terms of erectile function, voiding difficulty, incontinence and bowel function. These differences seem to persist for at least 3-5 years post-treatment though longer-term quality of life outcomes from modem techniques are unknown. Conclusion: BXT offers a high probability of maintaining continence, potency and normal rectal function though both storage and voiding urinary symptoms have been reported. Addition of androgen deprivation and EBRT to BXT may increase urinary, bowel and sexual toxicity of treatment. Quality of life outcome following brachytherapy compares favourably with other radical treatment options for the management of early prostate cancer. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
*AC UR RET MAN STR, 2002, 5 ANN PROST ADV BRAC
[2]   Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Gleason, DF ;
Barry, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :975-980
[3]  
BARRY MJ, 1995, UROL CLIN N AM, V22, P299
[4]   Quality of life outcomes after brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer [J].
Brandeis, JM ;
Litwin, MS ;
Burnison, CM ;
Reiter, RE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) :851-857
[5]   RECALL BIAS IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES - AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK [J].
CHOUINARD, E ;
WALTER, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (02) :245-254
[6]   Factors influencing risk of acute urinary retention after TRUS-guided permanent prostate seed implantation [J].
Crook, J ;
McLean, M ;
Catton, C ;
Yeung, I ;
Tsihlias, J ;
Pintilie, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (02) :453-460
[7]   Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: Differences based on treatment modality [J].
Davis, JW ;
Kuban, DA ;
Lynch, DF ;
Schellhammer, PF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (03) :947-952
[8]   RECOLLECTED VERSUS CONTEMPORARY PATIENT REPORTS OF PREOPERATIVE SYMPTOMS IN MEN UNDERGOING TRANSURETHRAL PROSTATIC RESECTION FOR BENIGN DISEASE [J].
EMBERTON, M ;
CHALLANDS, A ;
STYLES, RA ;
WIGHTMAN, JAK ;
BLACK, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (06) :749-756
[9]  
Fulmer BR, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P2046, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010601)91:11<2046::AID-CNCR1231>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-W