Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consistency

被引:460
作者
Cushman, Samuel A. [1 ]
McGariyal, Kevin [1 ]
Neel, Maile C. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Missoula, MT 59801 USA
关键词
landscape structure; landscape pattern; landscape monitoring; ecological indicators; FRAGSTATS; landscape metrics;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.12.002
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecologists can be overwhelmed by the number of metrics available to quantify landscape structure. Clarification of interrelationships and redundancy is needed to guide metric selection and interpretation for the purpose of landscape monitoring. In this study we identified independent components of class- and landscape-level structure in multiple landscapes in each of three large and geographically disjunct study areas. We used FRAGSTATS and principal components analysis (PCA) to identify independent components of landscape structure, and cluster analysis to group the components. We then calculated the universality, strength, and consistency of the identified landscape structure components. At the class-level we identified 24 independent configuration components. Seven of these components were nearly universal and consistent in interpreted meaning. At the landscape-level there were 17 independent structure components. Eight of these components were universal and consistent. These results indicate that there are consistent combinations of metrics that universally describe the major attributes of landscape structure at the class- and lands cape-levels. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 703
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   THE R LE-PROGRAMS FOR MULTISCALE ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE USING THE GRASS GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEM [J].
BAKER, WL ;
CAI, YM .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1992, 7 (04) :291-302
[2]  
BALDWIN DJB, 2001, 150 ONT MIN NAT RES, P45
[3]   A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics [J].
Cain, DH ;
Riitters, K ;
Orvis, K .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1997, 12 (04) :199-212
[4]   Spatial patterns in land cover of exurbanizing watersheds in southeastern Michigan [J].
Cifaldi, RL ;
Allan, JD ;
Duh, JD ;
Brown, DG .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2004, 66 (02) :107-123
[6]  
Fahrig L, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P346, DOI 10.2307/3060946
[7]   Landscape structure analysis of Kansas at three scales [J].
Griffith, JA ;
Martinko, EA ;
Price, KP .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2000, 52 (01) :45-61
[8]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LANDCOVER PROPORTION AND INDEXES OF LANDSCAPE SPATIAL PATTERN [J].
GUSTAFSON, EJ ;
PARKER, GR .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1992, 7 (02) :101-110
[9]   Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? [J].
Gustafson, EJ .
ECOSYSTEMS, 1998, 1 (02) :143-156
[10]   The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation [J].
Hargis, CD ;
Bissonette, JA ;
David, JL .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1998, 13 (03) :167-186