A DTI-based model for TMS using the independent impedance method with frequency-dependent tissue parameters

被引:38
作者
De Geeter, N. [1 ]
Crevecoeur, G. [1 ]
Dupre, L. [1 ]
Van Hecke, W. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Leemans, A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Elect Energy Syst & Automat, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Vis Lab, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Radiol, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[4] icoMetrix, B-3010 Kessel Lo, Belgium
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Image Sci Inst, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; INDUCED ELECTRIC-FIELD; DIFFUSION TENSOR; DIELECTRIC-PROPERTIES; HEAD MODEL; BRAIN; CONDUCTIVITY; HETEROGENEITY; COMPUTATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/57/8/2169
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
Accurate simulations on detailed realistic head models are necessary to gain a better understanding of the response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Hitherto, head models with simplified geometries and constant isotropic material properties are often used, whereas some biological tissues have anisotropic characteristics which vary naturally with frequency. Moreover, most computational methods do not take the tissue permittivity into account. Therefore, we calculate the electromagnetic behaviour due to TMS in a head model with realistic geometry and where realistic dispersive anisotropic tissue properties are incorporated, based on T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. This paper studies the impact of tissue anisotropy, permittivity and frequency dependence, using the anisotropic independent impedance method. The results show that anisotropy yields differences up to 32% and 19% of the maximum induced currents and electric field, respectively. Neglecting the permittivity values leads to a decrease of about 72% and 24% of the maximum currents and field, respectively. Implementing the dispersive effects of biological tissues results in a difference of 6% of the maximum currents. The cerebral voxels show limited sensitivity of the induced electric field to changes in conductivity and permittivity, whereas the field varies approximately linearly with frequency. These findings illustrate the importance of including each of the above parameters in the model and confirm the need for accuracy in the applied patient-specific method, which can be used in computer-assisted TMS.
引用
收藏
页码:2169 / 2188
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[2]
MR DIFFUSION TENSOR SPECTROSCOPY AND IMAGING [J].
BASSER, PJ ;
MATTIELLO, J ;
LEBIHAN, D .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 66 (01) :259-267
[3]
ESTIMATION OF THE EFFECTIVE SELF-DIFFUSION TENSOR FROM THE NMR SPIN-ECHO [J].
BASSER, PJ ;
MATTIELLO, J ;
LEBIHAN, D .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES B, 1994, 103 (03) :247-254
[4]
Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics [J].
Cole, KS ;
Cole, RH .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1941, 9 (04) :341-351
[5]
Modeling the effects of electrical conductivity of the head on the induced electric field in the brain during magnetic stimulation [J].
Davey, K ;
Epstein, CM ;
George, MS ;
Bohning, DE .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (11) :2204-2209
[6]
Eddy-Current Simulations Using an Independent Impedance Method in Anisotropic Biological Tissues [J].
De Geeter, Nele ;
Crevecoeur, Guillaume ;
Dupre, Luc .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2011, 47 (10) :3845-3848
[7]
An Efficient 3-D Eddy-Current Solver Using an Independent Impedance Method for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation [J].
De Geeter, Nele ;
Crevecoeur, Guillaume ;
Dupre, Luc .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 58 (02) :310-320
[8]
Diffusion tensor MRI-based estimation of the influence of brain tissue anisotropy on the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
De Lucia, M. ;
Parker, G. J. M. ;
Embleton, K. ;
Newton, J. M. ;
Walsh, V. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 36 (04) :1159-1170
[9]
Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Advanced Adjuncts in Preoperative Planning for Central Region Tumors [J].
Forster, Marie-Therese ;
Hattingen, Elke ;
Senft, Christian ;
Gasser, Thomas ;
Seifert, Volker ;
Szelenyi, Andrea .
NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 68 (05) :1317-1324
[10]
FOSTER KR, 1989, CRIT REV BIOMED ENG, V17, P25