BEaST: Brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique

被引:347
作者
Eskildsen, Simon F. [1 ,2 ]
Coupe, Pierrick [1 ]
Fonov, Vladimir [1 ]
Manjon, Jose V. [3 ]
Leung, Kelvin K. [4 ]
Guizard, Nicolas [1 ]
Wassef, Shafik N. [1 ]
Ostergaard, Lasse Riis [2 ]
Collins, D. Louis [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal Neurol Inst, McConnell Brain Imaging Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Aplicac Tecnol Informac & Comunicac Avanzada, Valencia 46022, Spain
[4] UCL Inst Neurol, DRC, London WC1N 3BG, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Brain extraction; Skull stripping; Patch-based segmentation; Multi-resolution; MRI; BET; AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; MR-IMAGES; ALGORITHM; VOLUME; REGISTRATION; HIPPOCAMPUS; MORPHOMETRY; VALIDATION; ACCURATE; ATLAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Brain extraction is an important step in the analysis of brain images. The variability in brain morphology and the difference in intensity characteristics due to imaging sequences make the development of a general purpose brain extraction algorithm challenging. To address this issue, we propose a new robust method (BEaST) dedicated to produce consistent and accurate brain extraction. This method is based on nonlocal segmentation embedded in a multi-resolution framework. A library of 80 priors is semi-automatically constructed from the NIH-sponsored MRI study of normal brain development, the International Consortium for Brain Mapping, and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative databases. In testing, a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.9834 +/- 0.0053 was obtained when performing leave-one-out cross validation selecting only 20 priors from the library. Validation using the online Segmentation Validation Engine resulted in a top ranking position with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.9781 +/- 0.0047. Robustness of BEaST is demonstrated on all baseline ADNI data, resulting in a very low failure rate. The segmentation accuracy of the method is better than two widely used publicly available methods and recent state-of-the-art hybrid approaches. BEaST provides results comparable to a recent label fusion approach, while being 40 times faster and requiring a much smaller library of priors. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2362 / 2373
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Aljabar P., 2007, INT C MED IM COMP CO, V10, P523
[2]   Voxel-based morphometry - The methods [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (06) :805-821
[3]   A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm [J].
Ashburner, John .
NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 38 (01) :95-113
[4]   Computing average shaped tissue probability templates [J].
Ashburner, John ;
Friston, Karl J. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 45 (02) :333-341
[5]   Segmentation of brain 3D MR images using level sets and dense registration [J].
Baillard, C ;
Hellier, P ;
Barillot, C .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2001, 5 (03) :185-194
[6]   Quantitative comparison of four brain extraction algorithms [J].
Boesen, K ;
Rehm, K ;
Schaper, K ;
Stoltzner, S ;
Woods, R ;
Lüders, E ;
Rottenberg, D .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 22 (03) :1255-1261
[7]   A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one [J].
Buades, A ;
Coll, B ;
Morel, JM .
MULTISCALE MODELING & SIMULATION, 2005, 4 (02) :490-530
[8]   Simple paradigm for extra-cerebral tissue removal: Algorithm and analysis [J].
Carass, Aaron ;
Cuzzocreo, Jennifer ;
Wheeler, M. Bryan ;
Bazin, Pierre-Louis ;
Resnick, Susan M. ;
Prince, Jerry L. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 56 (04) :1982-1992
[9]   Towards accurate, automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and amygdala from MRI by augmenting ANIMAL with a template library and label fusion [J].
Collins, D. Louis ;
Pruessner, Jens C. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 52 (04) :1355-1366
[10]   AUTOMATIC 3D INTERSUBJECT REGISTRATION OF MR VOLUMETRIC DATA IN STANDARDIZED TALAIRACH SPACE [J].
COLLINS, DL ;
NEELIN, P ;
PETERS, TM ;
EVANS, AC .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1994, 18 (02) :192-205