Positron emission tomography and pathological evidence of response to neoadjuvant therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

被引:53
作者
Smithers, B. M. [1 ,2 ]
Couper, G. C. [2 ]
Thomas, J. M. [2 ]
Wong, D. [5 ]
Gotley, D. C. [1 ,2 ]
Martin, I. [1 ,2 ]
Harvey, J. A. [3 ,4 ]
Thomson, D. B. [4 ]
Walpole, E. T. [4 ]
Watts, N. [5 ]
Burmeister, B. H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Surg, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Upper Gastrointestinal & Soft Tissue Unit, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[5] Wesley Private Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
esophageal adenocarcinoma; neoadjuvant therapy; positron emission tomography; tumor response;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00732.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Our aim was to determine if fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) could be correlated with a pathological response in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation therapy. Patients with resectable, histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were entered in the study. Preoperative chemotherapy comprised two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Radiation therapy commenced with the second cycle on day 22. FDG-PET images were obtained pre-treatment and on completion of intended neo-adjuvant treatment. Quantification was achieved by the calculation of both standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor/liver ratios (TLR). Evidence of histopathological response was identified according to the Mandard tumor regression scoring system. There were 45 patients, 22 receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 23 chemoradiation therapy. Forty patients underwent surgical resection. Seven patients (16%) had a histopathological response. The mean percentage change in SUV in the histological responders group was -56.8% (SD 29) and in the non-responders -27.8% (SD 32.1) (P = 0.035). The mean percentage change in TLR was -49.1% (SD 44.8) in the responders and in the non-responders -27.3% (SD 31.3) (P = 0.128). There was no difference between the two methods of assessment, however there was less variation with SUV. There was no correlation between the FDG-PET response and the histopathological response. Presently an FDG-PET scan performed 3-6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus should not be used as a marker of the potential result of the treatment. The optimal timing of a second FDG-PET remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 158
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Ancona E, 2001, CANCER, V91, P2165, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010601)91:11<2165::AID-CNCR1245>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-8
[3]  
Bancewicz J, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1727
[4]  
BERRINO F, 1999, IARC SCI PUBLICATION, V151
[5]   CONTINUING CLIMB IN RATES OF ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA - AN UPDATE [J].
BLOT, WJ ;
DEVESA, SS ;
FRAUMENI, JF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (11) :1320-1320
[6]  
Boellaard R, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1519
[7]   Effects of neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy on 18F-FDG-PET in esophageal carcinoma [J].
Brink, I ;
Hentschel, M ;
Bley, TA ;
Walch, A ;
Mix, M ;
Kleimaier, M ;
Moser, E ;
Imdahl, A .
EJSO, 2004, 30 (05) :544-550
[8]  
Brücher BLDM, 2001, ANN SURG, V233, P300
[9]   Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial [J].
Burmeister, BH ;
Smithers, BM ;
Gebski, V ;
Fitzgerald, L ;
Simes, RJ ;
Devitt, P ;
Ackland, S ;
Gotley, DC ;
Joseph, D ;
Millar, J ;
North, J ;
Walpole, ET ;
Denham, JW .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (09) :659-668
[10]   The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Bryant, AS ;
Ohja, B ;
Bartolucci, AA ;
Eloubeidi, MA .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 129 (06) :1232-1241