A comparison of sevoflurane, target-controlled infusion propofol, and propofol/isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid surgery: A quality of anesthesia and recovery profile

被引:37
作者
Godet, G [1 ]
Watremez, C [1 ]
El Kettani, C [1 ]
Soriano, C [1 ]
Coriat, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Anesthesiol, F-75013 Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200109000-00007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In a prospective randomized study in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, we compared the hemodynamic effects, the quality of induction, and the quality of recovery from a hypnotic drug for the induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane, a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, or propofol 1.5 mug/kg followed by isoflurane. All patients were premedicated with midazolam and received sufentanil 0.4 mug/kg at induction. The induction of anesthesia was associated with a decrease in arterial blood pressure in all groups, but this was least pronounced in the Sevoflurane group. There were similar a number of episodes of hypotension, hypertension, and tachycardia among groups, but the incidence of bradycardia was less in the TO group (P < 0.05) compared with the other groups. The duration of episodes of hypotension was shorter (P < 0.05) in the TCI Propofol group (1.9 +/- 2.3 min) compared with the Sevoflurane group (4.7 +/- 3.6 min). The duration of episodes of bradycardia was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the TO Propofol group (0.1 +/- 0.5 min) in comparison with the Propofol Bolus group (2.5 +/- 3.9 min). Similar doses of vasoactive drugs were used in all groups. The induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane was associated with inferior conditions for intubation in comparison with both Propofol groups, although the time to intubation was faster in the Sevoflurane group (P < 0.05). The recovery characteristics were similar in the three groups.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 565
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Myocardial ischemia and adverse cardiac outcomes in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery with sevoflurane and isoflurane [J].
Ebert, TJ ;
Kharasch, ED ;
Rooke, GA ;
Shroff, A ;
Muzi, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (05) :993-999
[2]   CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSES TO SEVOFLURANE - A REVIEW [J].
EBERT, TJ ;
HARKIN, CP ;
MUZI, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (06) :S11-S22
[3]   NEUROCIRCULATORY RESPONSES TO SEVOFLURANE IN HUMANS - A COMPARISON TO DESFLURANE [J].
EBERT, TJ ;
MUZI, M ;
LOPATKA, CW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (01) :88-95
[4]   SEVOFLURANE FOR OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON WITH PROPOFOL [J].
FREDMAN, B ;
NATHANSON, MH ;
SMITH, I ;
WANG, J ;
KLEIN, K ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) :823-828
[5]  
HALL RI, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P680
[6]   Haemodynamic comparison of sevoflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia in surgical patients [J].
Inada, T ;
Inada, K ;
Kawachi, S ;
Takubo, K ;
Tai, M ;
Yasugi, H .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (02) :140-145
[7]   The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients [J].
Jellish, WS ;
Lien, CA ;
Fontenot, HJ ;
Hall, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :479-485
[8]  
KATOH T, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P348
[9]   PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL DRIVEN INFUSION OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN [J].
MARSH, B ;
WHITE, M ;
MORTON, N ;
KENNY, GNC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (01) :41-48
[10]   HEMODYNAMIC INSTABILITY AND MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA DURING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - A COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND ISOFLURANE [J].
MUTCH, WAC ;
WHITE, IWC ;
DONEN, N ;
THOMSON, IR ;
ROSENBLOOM, M ;
CHEANG, M ;
WEST, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (07) :577-587