Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models

被引:10
作者
Fridley, B [1 ]
Rabe, K
de Andrade, M
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Stat, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Div Biostat, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Math, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S42
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Methods to handle missing data have been an area of statistical research for many years. Little has been done within the context of pedigree analysis. In this paper we present two methods for imputing missing data for polygenic models using family data. The imputation schemes take into account familial relationships and use the observed familial information for the imputation. A traditional multiple imputation approach and multiple imputation or data augmentation approach within a Gibbs sampler for the handling of missing data for a polygenic model are presented. We used both the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated missing phenotype and the complete phenotype data sets as the means to illustrate the two methods. We looked at the phenotypic trait systolic blood pressure and the covariate gender at time point 11 ( 1970) for Cohort 1 and time point 1 ( 1971) for Cohort 2. Comparing the results for three replicates of complete and missing data incorporating multiple imputation, we find that multiple imputation via a Gibbs sampler produces more accurate results. Thus, we recommend the Gibbs sampler for imputation purposes because of the ease with which it can be extended to more complicated models, the consistency of the results, and the accountability of the variation due to imputation.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation [J].
Barnard, J ;
Rubin, DB .
BIOMETRIKA, 1999, 86 (04) :948-955
[2]  
de Andrade M, 1999, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V17, P64, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)17:1<64::AID-GEPI5>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-M
[4]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FROM INCOMPLETE DATA VIA EM ALGORITHM [J].
DEMPSTER, AP ;
LAIRD, NM ;
RUBIN, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1977, 39 (01) :1-38
[5]   SAMPLING-BASED APPROACHES TO CALCULATING MARGINAL DENSITIES [J].
GELFAND, AE ;
SMITH, AFM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 85 (410) :398-409
[6]  
Gelman A, 2013, BAYESIAN DATA ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429258411
[7]   STOCHASTIC RELAXATION, GIBBS DISTRIBUTIONS, AND THE BAYESIAN RESTORATION OF IMAGES [J].
GEMAN, S ;
GEMAN, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1984, 6 (06) :721-741
[8]   Multiple imputation for multivariate data with missing and below-threshold measurements: Time-series concentrations of pollutants in the Arctic [J].
Hopke, PK ;
Liu, CH ;
Rubin, DB .
BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (01) :22-33
[9]   EXTENSIONS TO MULTIVARIATE NORMAL-MODELS FOR PEDIGREE ANALYSIS [J].
HOPPER, JL ;
MATHEWS, JD .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1982, 46 (OCT) :373-383
[10]   EXTENSIONS TO PEDIGREE ANALYSIS .3. VARIANCE COMPONENTS BY SCORING METHOD [J].
LANGE, K ;
WESTLAKE, J ;
SPENCE, MA .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1976, 39 (MAY) :485-491