Impact of switching virologically suppressed, HIV-1-infected patients from twice-daily fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine to once-daily fixed-dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine

被引:26
作者
DeJesus, Edwin [1 ]
Ruane, Peter [2 ]
McDonald, Cheryl [3 ]
Garcia, Fernando [4 ]
Sharma, Shetal [5 ]
Corales, Roberto [6 ]
Ravishankar, Jayashree [7 ]
Khanlou, Homayoun [8 ]
Shamblaw, David
Ecker, Janet [9 ]
Ebrahimi, Ramin [9 ]
Flaherty, John [9 ]
机构
[1] Orlando Immunol Ctr, Orlando, FL 32803 USA
[2] Lightsource Med Grp, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Tarrant Cty ID Associates, Ft Worth, TX USA
[4] Valley AIDS Council, Harlingen, TX USA
[5] N Broward Hosp Dist Comprehens Care Ctr, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
[6] AIDS Community Hlth Ctr, Rochester, NY USA
[7] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Star Hlth Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[8] AIDS Healthcare Fdn, Beverly Hills, CA USA
[9] Gilead Sci Inc, Foster City, CA USA
来源
HIV CLINICAL TRIALS | 2008年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
AZT/3TC; TDF/FTC; treatment simplification;
D O I
10.1310/hct0902-103
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: Evaluate the impact of switching from twice-daily zidovudine/lamivudine (AZT/3TC) to once-daily tenofovir DF plus erntricitabine (TDF/FTC) with efavirenz (EFV). Design: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm 24-week trial. Methods: Patients on EFV + AZT/3TC for >= 8 weeks with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL were switched to EFV + TDF/FTC and assessed for safety/tolerability, virologic and immunologic responses, adherence, and quality of life at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Results: Of 402 patients, 2% discontinued for an adverse event (AE) and 1 patient for virologic failure. At 24 weeks, 87% had HIV RNA <400 copies/mL, and 74% versus 71% at baseline had undetectable (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL) viral load (ITT, M=F). Treatment-emergent AEs were infrequent (<= 5%) with gastrointestinal complaints being the most common. At 24 weeks compared to baseline, hemoglobin (Hb) increased by a median of 0.6 g/dL (p < .001), and a decrease in creatinine clearance of 7.6 mL/min (p <.001) was observed. Fasting lipids decreased slightly (P < .02) in a subset of patients studied (n = 160). A higher percentage of patients reported being "very satisfied" with treatment and the absence of regimen side effects at 24 weeks versus baseline (p <.001). At 24 weeks, 86% of patients took >= 95% of doses versus 78% at baseline (p = .002). Conclusion: Patients switched to EFV + TDF/FTC maintained virologic suppression and the regimen was well tolerated. Patients reported increased satisfaction with treatment and fewer were bothered by side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 114
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Abacavir substitution for nucleoside analogs in patients with HIV lipoatrophy - A randomized trial
    Carr, A
    Workman, C
    Smith, DE
    Hoy, J
    Hudson, J
    Doong, N
    Martin, A
    Amin, J
    Freund, J
    Law, M
    Cooper, DA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (02): : 207 - 215
  • [2] The safety and efficacy of tenofovir DF in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz through 6 years in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients
    Cassetti, Isabel
    Madruga, Jose Valdez R.
    Suleiman, Jamal Muhamad A. H.
    Etzel, Arnaldo
    Zhong, Lijie
    Cheng, Andrew K.
    Enejosa, Jeffrey
    [J]. HIV CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 8 (03): : 164 - 172
  • [3] Adherence to HAART regimens
    Chesney, M
    [J]. AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2003, 17 (04) : 169 - 177
  • [4] Abacavir versus zidovudine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults
    DeJesus, E
    Herrera, G
    Teofilo, E
    Gerstoft, J
    Buendia, CB
    Brand, JD
    Brothers, CH
    Hernandez, J
    Castillo, SA
    Bonny, T
    Lanier, ER
    Scott, TR
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (07) : 1038 - 1046
  • [5] Switching effective antiretroviral therapy: A review
    Drechsler, H
    Powderly, WG
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 35 (10) : 1219 - 1230
  • [6] FISHER M, 2007, 11 EUR AIDS C OCT 24
  • [7] Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV
    Gallant, JE
    DeJesus, E
    Arribas, JR
    Pozniak, AL
    Gazzard, B
    Campo, RE
    Lu, B
    McColl, D
    Chuck, S
    Enejosa, J
    Toole, JJ
    Cheng, AK
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [8] Changes in renal function associated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment, compared with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor treatment
    Gallant, JE
    Parish, MA
    Keruly, JC
    Moore, RD
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 40 (08) : 1194 - 1198
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavuldine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients - A 3-year randomized trial
    Gallant, JE
    Staszewski, S
    Pozniak, AL
    DeJesus, E
    Suleiman, JMAH
    Miller, MD
    Coakley, DF
    Lu, B
    Toole, JJ
    Cheng, AK
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (02): : 191 - 201
  • [10] The effects of the Roche AMPLICOR HIV 1 MONITOR® UltraSensitive Test versions 1.0 and 1.5 viral load assays and plasma collection tube type on determination of response to antiretroviral therapy and the inappropriateness of cross-study comparisons
    Giordano, Michael
    Kelleher, Thomas
    Colonno, Richard J.
    Lazzarin, Adriano
    Squires, Kathleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2006, 35 (04) : 420 - 425