Mammography requests in general practice during the introduction of nationwide breast cancer screening, 1988-1995

被引:7
作者
Beemsterboer, PMM
de Koning, HJ
Looman, CWN
Borsboom, GJJM
Bartelds, AIM
van der Maas, PJ
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Inst Primary Hlth Care, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
side-effects; mass screening; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00377-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introducing an organised breast cancer screening programme for certain age groups in a population might induce opportunistic screening in adjacent (non-invited) age groups and influence health behaviour in the target population. We analysed the effect of the start of the Dutch national screening programme on the number of mammographies requested by 43-45 general practices for the age groups 30-39, 40-49, 50-69 and 70+ years, using logistic regression analysis. In all age groups an immediate increase was observed in the number of mammography requests after the start of the screening, which was largest and statistically significant in the target population of the screening programme (age 50-69 years), More than 2 years after the start of screening, the number of mammography requests in all age groups had decreased to the level before the start and in the age group 50-69 years the number of mammographies was significantly lower than before the screening started. The unexpected increase in mammographies after the start of the breast cancer screening programme might be related to registry problems or to the process of building up the screening programme. Eventually there was a decrease in the number of mammographies in the target: population, probably an effect of the introduction of the national screening programme. Opportunistic screening was not clearly demonstrated in adjacent age groups. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 454
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] BARTELDS AIM, 1996, CONTINUE MORBIDITEIT
  • [2] Day N, 1995, J Med Screen, V2, P180
  • [3] NATIONWIDE BREAST-CANCER SCREENING IN THE NETHERLANDS - SUPPORT FOR BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY REDUCTION
    DEKONING, HJ
    FRACHEBOUD, J
    BOER, R
    VERBEEK, ALM
    COLLETTE, HJA
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    VANINEVELD, BM
    DEBRUYN, AE
    Van Der Maas, PJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 60 (06) : 777 - 780
  • [4] BREAST-CANCER SCREENING AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS - POLICY ALTERNATIVES, QUALITY-OF-LIFE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE POSSIBLE IMPACT OF UNCERTAIN FACTORS
    DEKONING, HJ
    VANINEVELD, BM
    VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ
    DEHAES, JCJM
    COLLETTE, HJA
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    VANDERMAAS, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 49 (04) : 531 - 537
  • [5] BREAST-CANCER SCREENING - ITS IMPACT ON CLINICAL MEDICINE
    DEKONING, HJ
    VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ
    VANINEVELD, BM
    van der Maas, PJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 61 (02) : 292 - 297
  • [6] Fracheboud J, 1998, INT J CANCER, V75, P694, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980302)75:5<694::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-U
  • [8] SIDE-EFFECTS OF SCREENING
    GARSTIN, IWH
    KAUFMAN, Z
    MICHELL, MJ
    RODWAY, A
    EBBS, SR
    BAUM, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 29A (15) : 2150 - 2152
  • [9] Gordis L, 1997, J NATL CANCER I, V89, P1015, DOI 10.1093/jnci/89.14.1015
  • [10] Retrospective study of reasons for improved survival in patients with breast cancer in East Anglia: Earlier diagnosis or better treatment?
    Stockton, D
    Davies, T
    Day, N
    McCann, J
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7079) : 472 - 475