Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility

被引:247
作者
Wormanns, D
Kohl, G
Klotz, E
Marheine, A
Beyer, F
Heindel, W
Diederich, S
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Siemens Med Solut, Applicat Predev, CPC AP, D-91301 Forchheim, Germany
关键词
CT; lung nodule; volumetry; image processing;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-003-2132-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the in vivo measurement precision of a software tool for volumetric analysis of pulmonary nodules from two consecutive low-dose multi-row detector CT scans. A total of 151 pulmonary nodules (diameter 2.2-20.5 mm, mean diameter 7.4+/-4.5 mm) in ten subjects with pulmonary metastases were examined with low-dose four-detector-row CT (120 kVp, 20 mAs (effective), collimation 4x1 mm, normalized pitch 1.75, slice thickness 1.25 mm, reconstruction increment 0.8 mm; Somatom VolumeZoom, Siemens). Two consecutive low-dose scans covering the whole lung were performed within 10 min. Nodule volume was determined for all pulmonary nodules visually detected in both scans using the volumetry tool included in the Siemens LungCare software. The 95% limits of agreement between nodule volume measurements on different scans were calculated using the Bland and Altman method for assessing measurement agreement. Intra- and interobserver agreement of volume measurement were determined using repetitive measurements of 50 randomly selected nodules at the same scan by the same and different observers. Taking into account all 151 nodules, 95% limits of agreement were -20.4 to 21.9% (standard error 1.5%); they were -19.3 to 20.4% (standard error 1.7%) for 105 nodules <10 mm. Limits of agreement were -3.9 to 5.7% for intraobserver and -5.5 to 6.6% for interobserver agreement. Precision of in vivo volumetric analysis of nodules with an automatic volumetry software tool was sufficiently high to allow for detection of clinically relevant growth in small pulmonary nodules.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time [J].
Aoki, T ;
Nakata, H ;
Watanabe, H ;
Nakamura, K ;
Kasai, T ;
Hashimoto, H ;
Yasumoto, K ;
Kido, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (03) :763-768
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers [J].
Diederich, S ;
Wormanns, D ;
Semik, M ;
Thomas, M ;
Lenzen, H ;
Roos, N ;
Heindel, W .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (03) :773-781
[4]   Automatic segmentation of pulmonary nodules by using dynamic 3D cross-correlation for interactive CAD systems [J].
Fan, L ;
Qian, JZ ;
Odry, B ;
Shen, H ;
Naidich, D ;
Kohl, G ;
Klotz, E .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 1-3, 2002, 4684 :1362-1369
[5]   Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness [J].
Fischbach, F ;
Knollmann, F ;
Griesshaber, V ;
Freund, T ;
Akkol, E ;
Felix, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (10) :2378-2383
[6]   Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening [J].
Hasegawa, M ;
Sone, S ;
Takashima, S ;
Li, F ;
Yang, ZG ;
Maruyama, Y ;
Watanabe, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (876) :1252-1259
[7]   CT screening for lung cancer: Frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules [J].
Henschke, CI ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Mirtcheva, R ;
McGuinness, G ;
McCauley, D ;
Miettinen, OS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (05) :1053-1057
[8]   Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening [J].
Henschke, CI ;
McCauley, DI ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Naidich, DP ;
McGuinness, G ;
Miettinen, OS ;
Libby, DM ;
Pasmantier, MW ;
Koizumi, J ;
Altorki, NK ;
Smith, JP .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9173) :99-105
[9]   Peripheral lung cancer: Screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography [J].
Kaneko, M ;
Eguchi, K ;
Ohmatsu, H ;
Kakinuma, R ;
Naruke, T ;
Suemasu, K ;
Moriyama, N .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) :798-802
[10]  
KOHL G, 2002, P SPIE, V4684